[clang][NFC] updates cxx_status for P2113R0

[cjdb]

Summary

Issue #61857 identifies that there are some edge cases that aren't
accounted for, so we're regressing this from complete to partial.

[cjdb]

I'm going to keep this CL open till someone comments, but after reading the relevant GCC bug, I'm not sure it's worth committing anymore.

[royjacobson]

There was some discussion of this last year in this review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128750

It's such an edge case that I don't think we should lose sleep about it until/unless the committee finds time to clarify the issue.

[cjdb]

In D147288#4237413, @royjacobson wrote:

There was some discussion of this last year in this review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128750

It's such an edge case that I don't think we should lose sleep about it until/unless the committee finds time to clarify the issue.

I'm okay with this conclusion.

clang/www/cxx_status.html

</tr>
         <td><a href="https://wg21.link/p2493r0">P2493R0</a></td>
       </tr>
       <tr>
         <td><a href="https://wg21.link/p2092r0">P2092R0</a></td>
         <td rowspan="1" class="full" align="center">Clang 16</td>
       </tr>
       <tr>
         <td><a href="https://wg21.link/p2113r0">P2113R0</a></td>
-        <td rowspan="1" class="full" align="center">Clang 16</td>
+        <td rowspan="1" class="partial" align="center">
+          <details>
+            <summary>Partial</summary>
+            Some edge cases don't compile yet (such as the example in
+            <a href="https://eel.is/c++draft/temp.func.order#example-6">[temp.func.order]/example6</a>).
+            Please follow the <a href="https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/61857">GitHub issue</a>
+            for updates.
+          </details>
+        </td>
       </tr>
     <!-- Albuquerque papers -->
     <tr>
       <td>Range-based for statements with initializer</td>
       <td><a href="https://wg21.link/p0614r1">P0614R1</a></td>
       <td class="full" align="center">Clang 8</td>
     </tr>
     <tr>