[ELF][test] Improve AVR relocation tests

[benshi001]

lld/test/ELF/avr-reloc.s

75

These checks are omitted due to avr disassembler bugs. Now the bugs are fixed and so these checks should be enabled.

[benshi001]

@MaskRay What's your opinion on the NFC ？

[MaskRay]

Thanks!

[MaskRay]

For pure test changes, I think [test] is more common than [NFC]

For lld/ELF lld/test/ELF, [ELF] is more common. There are many lld ports with very different code and [lld] in my view does not provide much value. Personally I only use [lld] for common lld code.

[benshi001]

In D141197#4033708, @MaskRay wrote:

For pure test changes, I think [test] is more common than [NFC]

For lld/ELF lld/test/ELF, [ELF] is more common. There are many lld ports with very different code and [lld] in my view does not provide much value. Personally I only use [lld] for common lld code.

I will change to [ELF][test] while commtting. Thanks.

lld/test/ELF/avr-reloc.s

 
 .section .PORT,"ax",@progbits
 ; CHECK-LABEL: section .PORT:
 ; CHECK:       in     r20, 0x1e
 ; CHECK-NEXT:  sbic   0x1e, 0x1
 in    r20, b  ; R_AVR_PORT6
 sbic  b, 1    ; R_AVR_PORT5
 
-;; The disassembler is not yet able to decode those opcodes
-;; 0f c0    rjmp   .+30
-;; ee cf    rjmp   .-36
-;; 69 f0    breq   .+26
-;; 61 f3    breq   .-40
 .section .PCREL,"ax",@progbits
-; HEX-LABEL: section .PCREL:
-; HEX-NEXT:  0fc0eecf 69f061f3
+; CHECK-LABEL: section .PCREL
+; CHECK:       rjmp .+30
+; CHECK-NEXT:  rjmp .-36
+; CHECK-NEXT:  breq .+26
+; CHECK-NEXT:  breq .-40
+; HEX-LABEL:   section .PCREL:
+; HEX-NEXT:    0fc0eecf 69f061f3
 foo:
 rjmp foo + 32  ; R_AVR_13_PCREL
 rjmp foo - 32  ; R_AVR_13_PCREL
 breq foo + 32  ; R_AVR_7_PCREL
 breq foo - 32  ; R_AVR_7_PCREL
 
 .section .LDSSTS,"ax",@progbits
 ; CHECK-LABEL: section .LDSSTS: