Followup to D113537.
Details
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
Unit Tests
Event Timeline
Approach looks good to me.
remove-metadata-args.ll / --delta-passes=metadata is failing, which I might have been responsible for. Do you want me to have a look?
I have https://reviews.llvm.org/D113812 and https://reviews.llvm.org/D113808 out for that.
llvm/tools/llvm-reduce/deltas/Delta.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
129 | Hi! I've hit this assertion failure because I'm using llvm-reduce to reduce a compile-time hog, so the interestingness test ("does it take longer than 1 second to compile") is not 100% consistent. Of course it seems to me like llvm-reduce ought to support this use case. Any thoughts? |
llvm/tools/llvm-reduce/deltas/Delta.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
129 | In any case I think this should be a proper diagnostic, not an assert, like the "Input isn't interesting!" error. |
llvm/tools/llvm-reduce/deltas/Delta.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
129 | all of what you said sounds good to me |
Hi! I've hit this assertion failure because I'm using llvm-reduce to reduce a compile-time hog, so the interestingness test ("does it take longer than 1 second to compile") is not 100% consistent. Of course it seems to me like llvm-reduce ought to support this use case. Any thoughts?