Details
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
Event Timeline
clang/docs/AddressSanitizer.rst | ||
---|---|---|
18 | Please check that this is formatted reasonable in preview. | |
clang/docs/ClangCommandLineReference.rst | ||
889 | "Code generated and always enabled." is implementation details. Valid options are: * ``always`` - Detect use-after-return. * ``runtime`` - Detect use-after-return with runtime ON/OFF switch (environment variable `ASAN_OPTIONS=detect_stack_use_after_return=1`, default: 0) * ``never`` - Do not detect use-after-return. |
clang/docs/AddressSanitizer.rst | ||
---|---|---|
17 | rst uses two backsticks instead of one. |
clang/docs/ClangCommandLineReference.rst | ||
---|---|---|
3 | This file is generated by clang-tblgen -gen-opt-docs. You can edit clang/docs/UsersManual.rst and include the information that =never can reduce the object file size. |
clang/docs/ClangCommandLineReference.rst | ||
---|---|---|
3 | to clarify you need and then: ninja docs-clang-html AddressSanitizer.html will be somewhere in output, so you can check results @MaskRay @rsmith However I am not sure what to do with ClangCommandLineReference.rst. |
clang/docs/ClangCommandLineReference.rst | ||
---|---|---|
3 | The current state isn't ideal but that is what I have now (https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-September/066900.html) |
clang/docs/AddressSanitizer.rst | ||
---|---|---|
21 | seems overloaded for the list of bug types: Please create section, similar to Stack Use After Return --------------------- ... ... ... Memory leak detection --------------------- and include additional information there | |
clang/docs/ClangCommandLineReference.rst | ||
894 | I believe the best solution for now is just revert changes in this file and replace it with auto-generated version in a separate patch. | |
clang/docs/UsersManual.rst | ||
3737 ↗ | (On Diff #352289) | How about we update Options.td (in this patch) with: then we put corresponding text here and move block from UsersManual.rst:1851 into AddressSanitizer.rst (separate section) |
clang/docs/AddressSanitizer.rst | ||
---|---|---|
19–20 | I guess just flag name is enough here, the rest in the section below. |
clang/docs/AddressSanitizer.rst | ||
---|---|---|
143 | Maybe -fsanitize=address is reduntant here, we are already in the -fsanitize=address document. Mentioning the flag in the line 11 seems more appropriate. |
rst uses two backsticks instead of one.