This is an archive of the discontinued LLVM Phabricator instance.

Add support for DeclRefExpr in SyntaxTree, by generating IdExpressions
ClosedPublic

Authored by eduucaldas on Jun 4 2020, 8:15 AM.

Diff Detail

Event Timeline

eduucaldas created this revision.Jun 4 2020, 8:15 AM
Herald added a project: Restricted Project. · View Herald TranscriptJun 4 2020, 8:15 AM
Herald added a subscriber: cfe-commits. · View Herald Transcript
eduucaldas marked an inline comment as done.Jun 4 2020, 8:22 AM
eduucaldas added a subscriber: gribozavr2.
eduucaldas added inline comments.
clang/unittests/Tooling/Syntax/TreeTest.cpp
829

Perhaps we shouldn't differ between specifiers as that is semantical information

eduucaldas marked an inline comment as not done.Jun 4 2020, 8:22 AM
eduucaldas updated this revision to Diff 268503.Jun 4 2020, 9:19 AM
eduucaldas marked an inline comment as done.

.

clang/unittests/Tooling/Syntax/TreeTest.cpp
829

Followed the grammar, but added specifier in the end as we also hold the :: and not only the names

gribozavr2 added inline comments.Jun 4 2020, 9:49 AM
clang/unittests/Tooling/Syntax/TreeTest.cpp
815

This part does not seem to appear in the source.

eduucaldas updated this revision to Diff 269129.Jun 8 2020, 2:11 AM

cleanup for upstreaming

eduucaldas retitled this revision from Add support for id-expression in SyntaxTree to Add support for DeclRefExpr in SyntaxTree, by generating IdExpressions.Jun 8 2020, 2:27 AM
eduucaldas edited the summary of this revision. (Show Details)
eduucaldas added a reviewer: gribozavr2.
gribozavr2 added inline comments.Jun 8 2020, 6:58 AM
clang/include/clang/Tooling/Syntax/Nodes.h
190

Should there be getters for various parts of the specifier?

203

Could you add more details? Feel free to even quote the relevant grammar bits.

211

unqualified-id in the grammar can be more than one token.

212

Could you swap the order of getters to match the source order?

clang/lib/Tooling/Syntax/BuildTree.cpp
618

Do we need to mark the role if it is unknown?

clang/unittests/Tooling/Syntax/TreeTest.cpp
751

Could you add more tests even if they fail today due to missing implementation?

a::b::operator-(a::b::S())
a::b::S2<int>::f()

etc. Basically cover the whole grammar in tests, if possible.

eduucaldas marked 6 inline comments as done.Jun 9 2020, 12:24 AM
eduucaldas added inline comments.
clang/lib/Tooling/Syntax/BuildTree.cpp
618

Thanks, that had slipped through, sorry for that

eduucaldas marked an inline comment as done.Jun 9 2020, 12:24 AM
eduucaldas edited the summary of this revision. (Show Details)
This comment was removed by eduucaldas.
eduucaldas updated this revision to Diff 269423.EditedJun 9 2020, 12:31 AM

Answering simple comments

gribozavr2 added inline comments.Jun 9 2020, 12:56 AM
clang/include/clang/Tooling/Syntax/Nodes.h
208

Please add a TODO for the accessor for the 'template' keyword (and a test that has that keyword).

eduucaldas marked 7 inline comments as done.
  • cleanup for upstreaming
  • better coverage for unqualified-id
  • Better coverage for qualified-id
  • Finish implementing unqualified-id.
eduucaldas marked an inline comment as not done.Jun 18 2020, 2:35 AM
eduucaldas added inline comments.
clang/include/clang/Tooling/Syntax/Nodes.h
190

I think not.

208

I can implement accessor. But I couldn't write a test with this template keyword that uses DeclRefExpr. This is the test I came up with, note that both expressions are represented as DependentScopeDeclRefExpr

215

Just by looking at code it is impossible to know if the accessed thing is optional or not.
IdExpression ALWAYS has a UnqualifiedId
IdExpression MAY have a NestedNameSpecifier
This same issue repeats in other places

Fix mistake on getting SourceRange for template-id

gribozavr2 added inline comments.Jun 18 2020, 3:46 AM
clang/include/clang/Tooling/Syntax/Nodes.h
185

Could you provide examples or a grammar quote in the comment?

205

"the size in std::vector<int>::size"

212

Could you add TODOs about adding accessors?

clang/unittests/Tooling/Syntax/TreeTest.cpp
696

Could you split off the parts of this test that don't depend on C++11?

979

"WithTemplateKeyword"

1097

"QualifiedIdDecltype" for consistency with other tests.

1105

Indent -2?

1108

Could you indent the second line?

eduucaldas marked 12 inline comments as done.

Aswering comments

eduucaldas marked 2 inline comments as done.Jun 18 2020, 9:36 AM
eduucaldas added inline comments.
clang/include/clang/Tooling/Syntax/Nodes.h
190

Pospone to interface discussion with Yitzhak

212

Pospone to interface discussion with Yitzhak

clang/lib/Tooling/Syntax/Nodes.cpp
174–192

I was thinking and our problem is bigger than not testing for NodeRoles, we don't test accessors at all!

178

This should be an assert for now, as if that is not true it would be a logic problem. Same reasoning applies to CompoundStatement

gribozavr2 accepted this revision.Jun 18 2020, 10:13 AM
gribozavr2 added inline comments.
clang/lib/Tooling/Syntax/Nodes.cpp
178

Yep, feel free to change it to an assert.

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Jun 18 2020, 10:13 AM

change if -> asserts

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.

@eduucaldas

Hi, you can drop Reviewers: Subscribers: Tags: and the text Summary: from the git commit with the following script:

arcfilter () {
        arc amend
        git log -1 --pretty=%B | awk '/Reviewers:|Subscribers:/{p=1} /Reviewed By:|Differential Revision:/{p=0} !p && !/^Summary:$/ {sub(/^Summary: /,"");print}' | git commit --amend --date=now -F -
}

Reviewed By: is considered important by some people. Please keep the tag. (I have updated my script to use --date=now (setting author date to committer date))

https://reviews.llvm.org/D80978 contains a git pre-push hook to automate this.