Add missing OMP5.0 features.
@kkwli0 I propose you can merge the parts where discussion has reached a consensus while the other parts are resolved. I'm generally fine with this, we can always improve on it further.
Fair point. thx.
No also C/C++.
Agreed. We have the HTML version of the standard online so we can do this "easily" but it will cost someone time and require to change the table layout. Let's postpone it for now until someone find some spare minutes.
I guess if they are unclaimed or done we can just list them in the description:
`memory model update (seq_cst, acq_rel, ...)`
and if we ever support a subset only we can make new rows for them.
I think the description here should be something like "support close modifier on map clause". There is no "local" option for the map clause, and also the use of "close" is not dependent on the specification of the unified_shared_memory requirement.
Yep, it is not Fortran only. We clarify some pointer attachment behavior in 5.0.
Yes, it involves a significant change in the table if we include the corresponding text change in the table. In some cases, it is not clear from the original tickets. I think it is better to leave it as-is. If change the description can help, I welcome any suggestions.