Details
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
Event Timeline
clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/FindTargetTests.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
571 | ADD_FAILURE() should be enough to indicate there are errors to the users. Could you remove this assert? | |
751 | Could we assert there are no errors instead? |
Unit tests: pass. 61726 tests passed, 0 failed and 779 were skipped.
clang-tidy: fail. Please fix clang-tidy findings.
clang-format: pass.
Build artifacts: diff.json, clang-tidy.txt, clang-format.patch, CMakeCache.txt, console-log.txt, test-results.xml
LGTM, thanks!
clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/FindTargetTests.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
898 | NIT: is this change redundant now? This was probably a warning, not an error. |
Address nit
clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/FindTargetTests.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
898 | You're right, reverted this change. |
Unit tests: pass. 61771 tests passed, 0 failed and 780 were skipped.
clang-tidy: pass.
clang-format: pass.
Build artifacts: diff.json, clang-tidy.txt, clang-format.patch, CMakeCache.txt, console-log.txt, test-results.xml
ADD_FAILURE() should be enough to indicate there are errors to the users.
No need to crash additionally.
Could you remove this assert?