[NewPassManager] Add tuning option: LoopUnrolling [clang-change]

[asbirlea]

Summary

Use CodeGenOpts's setting for loop unrolling.
[to be coupled with D61618]

[chandlerc]

Same comment as on other Clang patch -- let's update an IR generation test to reflect this?

Should just be adding a RUN line.

[asbirlea]

Added test. Last RUN line fails before this patch (i.e. unrolling is not disabled with the given flag in the new pass manager).

[asbirlea]

Update test.

cfe/trunk/lib/CodeGen/BackendUtil.cpp

if (PGOOpt.hasValue()) {
                           CodeGenOpts.InstrProfileOutput.empty()
                               ? DefaultProfileGenName
                               : CodeGenOpts.InstrProfileOutput,
                           "", PGOOptions::NoAction, PGOOptions::CSIRInstr,
                           CodeGenOpts.DebugInfoForProfiling);
   }
 
   PipelineTuningOptions PTO;
+  PTO.LoopUnrolling = CodeGenOpts.UnrollLoops;
   // For historical reasons, loop interleaving is set to mirror setting for loop
   // unrolling.
   PTO.LoopInterleaving = CodeGenOpts.UnrollLoops;
   PTO.LoopVectorization = CodeGenOpts.VectorizeLoop;
   PTO.SLPVectorization = CodeGenOpts.VectorizeSLP;
 
   PassBuilder PB(TM.get(), PTO, PGOOpt);
 

cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/loop-unroll.c

+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64 -target-cpu x86-64 -S -O1 -funroll-loops -emit-llvm -o - %s | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-ENABLE-UNROLL
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64 -target-cpu x86-64 -S -O1 -fno-unroll-loops -emit-llvm -o - %s | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-DISABLE-UNROLL
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64 -target-cpu x86-64 -fexperimental-new-pass-manager -S -O1 -funroll-loops -emit-llvm -o - %s | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-ENABLE-UNROLL
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64 -target-cpu x86-64 -fexperimental-new-pass-manager -S -O1 -fno-unroll-loops -emit-llvm -o - %s | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-DISABLE-UNROLL
+
+// CHECK-ENABLE-UNROLL-LABEL: @for_test()
+// CHECK-ENABLE-UNROLL: br label %[[FORBODY:[a-z0-9_\.]+]]
+// CHECK-ENABLE-UNROLL: [[FORBODY]]:
+// CHECK-ENABLE-UNROLL: store
+// CHECK-ENABLE-UNROLL: store
+// CHECK-ENABLE-UNROLL: br i1 %[[EXITCOND:[a-z0-9_\.]+]], label %[[FORBODY5:[a-z0-9_\.]+]], label %[[FORBODY]]
+// CHECK-ENABLE-UNROLL: [[FORBODY5]]:
+// CHECK-ENABLE-UNROLL: fmul
+// CHECK-ENABLE-UNROLL: fadd
+// CHECK-ENABLE-UNROLL: store
+// CHECK-ENABLE-UNROLL: fmul
+// CHECK-ENABLE-UNROLL: fadd
+// CHECK-ENABLE-UNROLL: store
+// CHECK-ENABLE-UNROLL: fmul
+// CHECK-ENABLE-UNROLL: fadd
+// CHECK-ENABLE-UNROLL: store
+
+// CHECK-DISABLE-UNROLL-LABEL: @for_test()
+// CHECK-DISABLE-UNROLL: br label %[[FORBODY:[a-z0-9_\.]+]]
+// CHECK-DISABLE-UNROLL: [[FORBODY]]:
+// CHECK-DISABLE-UNROLL: store
+// CHECK-DISABLE-UNROLL-NOT: store
+// CHECK-DISABLE-UNROLL: br i1 %[[EXITCOND:[a-z0-9_\.]+]], label %[[FORBODY5:[a-z0-9_\.]+]], label %[[FORBODY]]
+// CHECK-DISABLE-UNROLL: [[FORBODY5]]:
+// CHECK-DISABLE-UNROLL: fmul
+// CHECK-DISABLE-UNROLL: fadd
+// CHECK-DISABLE-UNROLL: store
+// CHECK-DISABLE-UNROLL: fmul
+// CHECK-DISABLE-UNROLL: fadd
+// CHECK-DISABLE-UNROLL: store
+// CHECK-DISABLE-UNROLL-NOT: fmul
+// CHECK-DISABLE-UNROLL-NOT: fadd
+// CHECK-DISABLE-UNROLL-NOT: store
+
+int printf(const char * restrict format, ...);
+
+void for_test() {
+  double A[1000], B[1000];
+  int L = 500;
+  for (int i = 0; i < L; i++) {
+    A[i] = i;
+  }
+  for (int i = 0; i < L; i++) {
+    B[i] = A[i]*5;
+    B[i]++;
+    A[i] *= 7;
+    A[i]++;
+  }
+  printf("%lf %lf\n", A[0], B[0]);
+}