Fixes rdar://49523079
Details
Details
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rL LLVM
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
Should we have a special has_feature test to check that this attribute is allowed on implementations? We've done that in the past when expanding the set of subjects for an attribute. But that's not necessary if we haven't made this attribute part of a public Xcode release yet, because then the attribute is just understood to always apply to implementations; I can't remember when exactly this was added and what releases it's made it into.
Comment Actions
I think we can sneak by without a __has_feature for this, D56555 isn't in LLVM 8 nor Xcode 10.2.