Details
Details
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rL LLVM
Event Timeline
lib/Target/AMDGPU/MCTargetDesc/AMDGPUHSAMetadataStreamer.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
258 ↗ | (On Diff #154672) | Do we need to check this? What if a non-OpenCL program wants implicit kernel argument? Can we remove the dependence on opencl.ocl.version here? |
lib/Target/AMDGPU/MCTargetDesc/AMDGPUHSAMetadataStreamer.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
258 ↗ | (On Diff #154672) | I thought the whole point was to remove this check |
lib/Target/AMDGPU/MCTargetDesc/AMDGPUHSAMetadataStreamer.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
384 ↗ | (On Diff #154672) | Missing space |
Comment Actions
Drop checks for OpenCL. I was not aware that it was decided to possibly allow this for non-OpenCL languages.
lib/Target/AMDGPU/MCTargetDesc/AMDGPUHSAMetadataStreamer.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
258 ↗ | (On Diff #154683) | Just checking if this is correct for Mesa too? |
lib/Target/AMDGPU/MCTargetDesc/AMDGPUHSAMetadataStreamer.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
258 ↗ | (On Diff #154683) | Clover doesn't use this attribute. I'm not sure what the current state is, but it follow some frankenstein ABI between HSA and what it was doing before. Since it isn't really maintained I don't think we need to worry too much about it |