This adds support for handling f16 stack spills/reloads.
Details
Details
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
Event Timeline
test/CodeGen/ARM/fp16-instructions.ll | ||
---|---|---|
728 | This test looks more complicated than it needs to be, can it be reduced? |
Comment Actions
This IR is generated from the reduced C test case:
fn1() { fn2(9.765625e4F16); fn3(9.765625e4F16); }
There is a bit of bitcasting going on because of the way we pass half-floats,
and a few alloca's because the easiest way to trigger this is with fast-isel
and no reg allocation, so I am not sure how I can further reduce this.
Comment Actions
The test case doesn't have to be exactly the -O0 output from clang, you should reduce it to clear IR which triggers the bug. To start with, are all of those allocas and memcpy calls required?
This test looks more complicated than it needs to be, can it be reduced?