Descriptions of checks were extracted from documentations. If style is wrong, will be good idea if native English speaker will fix both release notes and documentation.
I also mentioned fix of crash on compile database with relative paths.
Differential D18582
[Clang-tidy] Update release notes with list of checks added since 3.8 Eugene.Zelenko on Mar 29 2016, 3:46 PM. Authored by
Details Descriptions of checks were extracted from documentations. If style is wrong, will be good idea if native English speaker will fix both release notes and documentation. I also mentioned fix of crash on compile database with relative paths.
Diff Detail
Event TimelineComment Actions Looks good with a nit. Thank you!
Comment Actions A few more nits.
Comment Actions Which style I should use? Suggested by Richard or just provide links to documentation as in updated version?
Comment Actions Sections headers are not problem :-) See newly added "Clang-tidy changes from 3.7 to 3.8" section. It contains only names of checks with link to documentation page without brief description. Comment Actions The summaries + links to the check docs would probably be the most useful format (btw, it makes sense to add the links to the new entries as well). I was just too lazy to manually write/copy-paste-edit the summaries for the ~40 checks in the 3.7->3.8 section. Comment Actions Which links should I use, since it should point to release specific location, but 3.9 is not branched yet? Comment Actions Addressed Alex and Richard comments except links. Also fixed spotted issues in checks documentation. Looks like better documentation proofreading during code review is needed. Comment Actions thanks for taking care of this.
Comment Actions Updated per Etienne comments. Links are still need to be added, but I'm not clear about address. Comment Actions I'd point the links to the live version (e.g. http://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/readability-redundant-string-init.html) and then update them once the next release is branched.
Comment Actions One more nit.
Comment Actions I align them as in 3.8 changes, to first `. If you think that alignment should be other way, I'll change it. Comment Actions This observation doesn't capture the intent correctly. They are aligned with the first column after the "- ", which in some cases happens to contain the first backquote. |
Should these lines be indented to New ... (i.e. with just two spaces)?