This will avoid hardcoding all unsupported targets, since even after one
more follow up fix [1], there is one more failure.
[1]: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150886
Plus, if you want to run it locally on some target that CI does not
covers, it could also false-positively fail, which is not good.
Well, I don't want to be picky but if you want to use a long name anyway, than perhaps something like "32-bit-pointer" would be more precise. After all, I dare say n32 ABI is also using 32-bit pointers but it's works only on a 64-bit CPU architecture.