This simple diff declares some enum values needed to create a REPL for the mojo language.
Details
Details
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
Could we switch the RTTI to use the llvm RTTI extension mechanism, instead of enums? Other classes have started doing this, and it'd be really nice if users can write REPLS without needing to touch upstream LLDB.
Comment Actions
+1, LLVM's RTTI mechanism would make it easier to add new things without needing to change base classes.
lldb/include/lldb/Expression/ExpressionTypeSystemHelper.h | ||
---|---|---|
32 | I was expecting you'd just use RTTIExtends from Support/ExtensibleRTTI.h, any reason not to use that? |
I was expecting you'd just use RTTIExtends from Support/ExtensibleRTTI.h, any reason not to use that?