the v4 rebuilding is a best-effort because it's not possible to reliably
parse the DWO ID as it requires the abbrev section (& if the index isn't
trustworthy then there's no way to find the associated abbrev section
contribution for a given info section contribution)
But in v5 the DWO ID/type signature is in the header and can be rebuilt
losslessly (only at the cost of performance of rescanning/parsing the
headers of all the units), so let's implement that.
the testing isn't /ideal/ - I think the testing should've been
implemented as a hardcoded dwp file with a corrupted/incorrect index,
then the test could've demonstrated that reparsing the index produces
the right answer - but this is a quick port of the existing v5 test back
to v4 so that we don't lose coverage on the v4 codepath now that it's
separated from the v5 codepath.
Would printing out signature make it easier to find offending entry?