Previously, it used DimLevelType::SingletonNo to represent an unorder COO
tensor of rank 1 while it should use DimLevelType::CompressedNuNo.
Details
Details
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
Event Timeline
mlir/lib/Dialect/SparseTensor/Transforms/SparseTensorRewriting.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
139 | If I'm reading things right, shouldn't this TODO apply to the CompressedNu(No) level rather than the SingletonNuNo levels? |
If I'm reading things right, shouldn't this TODO apply to the CompressedNu(No) level rather than the SingletonNuNo levels?