This is the diff associated with D95267: Add the use of register r for outlined function when register r is live in and defined later., and we need to mark $x0 as live whether or not $x0 is dead.
The compiler also needs to mark register $x0 as live in for the following case.
$x1 = ADDXri $sp, 16, 0 BL @spam, csr_darwin_aarch64_aapcs, implicit-def dead $lr, implicit $sp, implicit $x0, implicit killed $x1, implicit-def $sp, implicit-def $x0
This change fixes an issue where the wrong registers were used when -machine-outliner-reruns>0.
As an example:
typedef struct { double v1; double v2; } D16; typedef struct { D16 v1; D16 v2; } D32; typedef long long LL8; typedef struct { long long v1; long long v2; } LL16; typedef struct { LL16 v1; LL16 v2; } LL32; typedef struct { LL32 v1; LL32 v2; } LL64; LL8 needx0(LL8 v0, LL8 v1); void bar(LL64 v1, LL32 v2, LL16 v3, LL32 v4, LL8 v5, D16 v6, D16 v7, D16 v8); LL8 foo(LL8 v0, LL64 v1, LL32 v2, LL16 v3, LL32 v4, LL8 v5, D16 v6, D16 v7, D16 v8) { LL8 result = needx0(v0, 0); bar(v1, v2, v3, v4, v5, v6, v7, v8); return result + 1; }
As you can see from the foo function, we should not modify the value of x0 until we call needx0.
This code is compiled to give the following instruction MIR code.
$sp = frame-setup SUBXri $sp, 256, 0 frame-setup STPDi killed $d13, killed $d12, $sp, 16 frame-setup STPDi killed $d11, killed $d10, $sp, 18 frame-setup STPDi killed $d9, killed $d8, $sp, 20 frame-setup STPXi killed $x26, killed $x25, $sp, 22 frame-setup STPXi killed $x24, killed $x23, $sp, 24 frame-setup STPXi killed $x22, killed $x21, $sp, 26 frame-setup STPXi killed $x20, killed $x19, $sp, 28 ... $x1 = MOVZXi 0, 0 BL @needx0, csr_darwin_aarch64_aapcs, implicit-def dead $lr, implicit $sp, implicit $x0, implicit $x1, implicit-def $sp, implicit-def $x0 ...
Since there are some other instruction sequences that duplicate foo, after the first execution of Machine Outliner you will get:
$sp = frame-setup SUBXri $sp, 256, 0 frame-setup STPDi killed $d13, killed $d12, $sp, 16 frame-setup STPDi killed $d11, killed $d10, $sp, 18 frame-setup STPDi killed $d9, killed $d8, $sp, 20 $x7 = ORRXrs $xzr, $lr, 0 BL @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0, implicit-def $lr, implicit $sp, implicit-def $lr, implicit $sp, implicit $xzr, implicit $x7, implicit $x19, implicit $x20, implicit $x21, implicit $x22, implicit $x23, implicit $x24, implicit $x25, implicit $x26 $lr = ORRXrs $xzr, $x7, 0 ... BL @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_1, implicit-def $lr, implicit $sp, implicit-def $lr, implicit-def $sp, implicit-def $x0, implicit-def $x1, implicit $sp ...
For the first time we outlined the following sequence:
frame-setup STPXi killed $x26, killed $x25, $sp, 22 frame-setup STPXi killed $x24, killed $x23, $sp, 24 frame-setup STPXi killed $x22, killed $x21, $sp, 26 frame-setup STPXi killed $x20, killed $x19, $sp, 28
and
$x1 = MOVZXi 0, 0 BL @needx0, csr_darwin_aarch64_aapcs, implicit-def dead $lr, implicit $sp, implicit $x0, implicit $x1, implicit-def $sp, implicit-def $x0
When we execute the outline again, we will get:
$x0 = ORRXrs $xzr, $lr, 0 <---- here BL @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_2_0, implicit-def $lr, implicit $sp, implicit-def $sp, implicit-def $lr, implicit $sp, implicit $xzr, implicit $d8, implicit $d9, implicit $d10, implicit $d11, implicit $d12, implicit $d13, implicit $x0 $lr = ORRXrs $xzr, $x0, 0 $x7 = ORRXrs $xzr, $lr, 0 BL @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_0, implicit-def $lr, implicit $sp, implicit-def $lr, implicit $sp, implicit $xzr, implicit $x7, implicit $x19, implicit $x20, implicit $x21, implicit $x22, implicit $x23, implicit $x24, implicit $x25, implicit $x26 $lr = ORRXrs $xzr, $x7, 0 ... BL @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_1, implicit-def $lr, implicit $sp, implicit-def $lr, implicit-def $sp, implicit-def $x0, implicit-def $x1, implicit $sp
When calling OUTLINED_FUNCTION_2_0, we used x0 to save the lr register.
The reason for the above error appears to be that:
BL @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_1, implicit-def $lr, implicit $sp, implicit-def $lr, implicit-def $sp, implicit-def $x0, implicit-def $x1, implicit $sp
should be:
BL @OUTLINED_FUNCTION_1, implicit-def $lr, implicit $sp, implicit-def $lr, implicit-def $sp, implicit-def $x0, implicit-def $x1, implicit $sp, implicit $x0
When processing the same instruction with both implicit-def $x0 and implicit $x0 we should keep implicit $x0.
A reproducible demo is available at: https://github.com/DianQK/reproduce_outlined_function_use_live_x0.
Why do you need to change this test file? With this fix, $x0 should be marked as use.