Details
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
Event Timeline
llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer.h | ||
---|---|---|
159 | Could please please replace Module with targetTriple and pointerSizeInBits. | |
llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizerCommon.h | ||
90 ↗ | (On Diff #367500) | I don't see implementation of this one. And I expected getAddressSanitizerParams here, not in AddressSanitizer.h. Is there a reson to declare it there? |
llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer.cpp | ||
566 | It would be nice to introduce this function as a separate NFC patch. |
llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
571 | Unfortunately we need Kernel as argument, similar to RecoverShift in HWAsan. I propose to have own set of intrinsics for kernel/non-kernel to avoid fancy bit packing or unreadable 1/0 arguments. |
clang/test/CodeGen/asan-use-callbacks.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
9 ↗ | (On Diff #367585) | for -mllvm flag we need test under llvm/test not clang. llvm test needs to be more meaningful, e.g. check precice value passed into intrinsic |
clang/test/CodeGen/asan-use-callbacks.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
9 ↗ | (On Diff #367585) | to clarify I believe we will not add corresponding frontend clang flag for asan-optimize-callbacks. We will make it default ON after some testing and benchmarking. |
There is also "Add Acction..."-> "Plan changes", which will remove it from reviewers dashboards.
llvm/test/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer/asan-optimize-callbacks.ll | ||
---|---|---|
6 ↗ | (On Diff #368959) | Can you please include negative cases as well? ; RUN: opt < %s -asan -enable-new-pm=0 -asan-instrumentation-with-call-threshold=0 -asan-optimize-callbacks=0 -S | FileCheck %s --implicit-check-not llvm.asan.check.memaccess |
Could please please replace Module with targetTriple and pointerSizeInBits.
We don't need entire module for that even if current callers have it.