X86: balance the frame prologue and epilogue on Win64

[compnerd]

Summary

This was broken in ba1509da7b89c850c89f0f98afbab375794cd3c8. The Win64
frame would not perform the setup of the Swift async context parameter
but would tear down the setup in the epilogue resulting in crashes.
This ensures that we do the full setup when we do the tear down.
Although this is non-conforming to the Win64 calling convention, it
corrects the setup and exposes the actual issue that the change
introduced: incorrect frame setup.

[rnk]

lgtm

The code change is just adjusting some if conditions and changing indentation, so there's no reason to hold it up with my design questions. Please consider implementing the refactoring suggestion as a follow-up, though.

llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FrameLowering.cpp

1486

As a style comment, I think this code would be easier to read if it was moved out of line. The emitPrologue/emitEpilog functions are really, really long. Anything you can do to shorten them helps with understanding. If you can pair the swift async context setup and teardown code somewhere later in the file, it would help. The main state going in and out is MBB, MBBI, DL. See BuildStackAlignAND for an example of this.

llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/swift-async-win64.ll

9–10

Maybe I misunderstand, but won't this prevent every existing Windows unwinder, debuggers included, from unwinding the native stack? BTS *sets* bit 60 of RBP before it is pushed. If the caller's frame uses RBP as a frame pointer, how will a Swift-unaware stack unwinder use RBP to continue unwinding? It won't know to clear out bit 60.

Is it really the plan to make it so that you cannot debug Swift code from a Swift-unaware debugger? I'm not sure LLDB on Windows is really ready, so I imagine that folks will want to use windbg to debug Swift code in the near future. This isn't a Windows-specific concern either. Anyone using gdb, rr, perf, and other stack samplers on Linux will have similar issues, right?

[compnerd]

llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FrameLowering.cpp

1486

I completely agree with you on this point. I really want to see if I can split out the functions somewhat in follow ups. The reason is that right now the code is really difficult to read as there are the following paths:

• Win32
  • Funclet
  • Non-Funclet
• Win64
  • Funclet
  • Non-Funclet
• Non-Windows

It really feels like this should be three different implementations but I dont fully see how to structure this yet.

llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/swift-async-win64.ll

9–10

Yes, it does break other unwinders AIUI. The bit 60 is the marker that debugger uses to determine if the frame contains an async context (or NULL), which is expected to be the next value after the base pointer.

Swift debugging is already broken entirely with non-lldb debuggers sadly. However, that does does misrepresent the reality that WinDBG is really the debugger of choice currently on Windows. Debugging Swift on Linux already requires LLDB on Linux, and that includes gdb, rr, perf, or any other stack samplers.

llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86FrameLowering.cpp

 
     if (NeedsWinCFI) {
       HasWinCFI = true;
       BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII.get(X86::SEH_PushReg))
           .addImm(FramePtr)
           .setMIFlag(MachineInstr::FrameSetup);
     }
 
-    if (!IsWin64Prologue && !IsFunclet) {
-      // Update EBP with the new base value.
-      if (!X86FI->hasSwiftAsyncContext()) {
-        BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL,
-                TII.get(Uses64BitFramePtr ? X86::MOV64rr : X86::MOV32rr),
-                FramePtr)
-            .addReg(StackPtr)
-            .setMIFlag(MachineInstr::FrameSetup);
-      } else {
+    if (!IsFunclet) {
+      if (X86FI->hasSwiftAsyncContext()) {
+        const auto &Attrs = MF.getFunction().getAttributes();
+
         // Before we update the live frame pointer we have to ensure there's a
         // valid (or null) asynchronous context in its slot just before FP in
         // the frame record, so store it now.
-        const auto &Attrs = MF.getFunction().getAttributes();
-
         if (Attrs.hasAttrSomewhere(Attribute::SwiftAsync)) {
           // We have an initial context in r14, store it just before the frame
           // pointer.
           MBB.addLiveIn(X86::R14);
           BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII.get(X86::PUSH64r))
-              .addReg(X86::R14)
-              .setMIFlag(MachineInstr::FrameSetup);
         } else {
           // No initial context, store null so that there's no pointer that
           // could be misused.
           BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII.get(X86::PUSH64i8))
-              .addImm(0)
-              .setMIFlag(MachineInstr::FrameSetup);
         }
-        BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII.get(X86::LEA64r), FramePtr)
-            .addUse(X86::RSP)
-            .addImm(1)
-            .addUse(X86::NoRegister)
-            .addImm(8)
-            .addUse(X86::NoRegister)
+
+        if (NeedsWinCFI) {
+          HasWinCFI = true;
+          BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII.get(X86::SEH_PushReg))
+            .addImm(X86::R14)
             .setMIFlag(MachineInstr::FrameSetup);
+        }
+
+        BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII.get(X86::LEA64r), FramePtr)
+          .addUse(X86::RSP)
+          .addImm(1)
+          .addUse(X86::NoRegister)
+          .addImm(8)
+          .addUse(X86::NoRegister)
+          .setMIFlag(MachineInstr::FrameSetup);
         BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII.get(X86::SUB64ri8), X86::RSP)
-            .addUse(X86::RSP)
-            .addImm(8)
-            .setMIFlag(MachineInstr::FrameSetup);
       }
 
-      if (NeedsDwarfCFI) {
-        // Mark effective beginning of when frame pointer becomes valid.
-        // Define the current CFA to use the EBP/RBP register.
-        unsigned DwarfFramePtr = TRI->getDwarfRegNum(MachineFramePtr, true);
-        BuildCFI(MBB, MBBI, DL, MCCFIInstruction::createDefCfaRegister(
-                                    nullptr, DwarfFramePtr));
-      }
+      if (!IsWin64Prologue && !IsFunclet) {
+        // Update EBP with the new base value.
+        if (!X86FI->hasSwiftAsyncContext())
+          BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL,
+                  TII.get(Uses64BitFramePtr ? X86::MOV64rr : X86::MOV32rr),
+                  FramePtr)
+              .addReg(StackPtr)
+              .setMIFlag(MachineInstr::FrameSetup);
 
-      if (NeedsWinFPO) {
-        // .cv_fpo_setframe $FramePtr
-        HasWinCFI = true;
-        BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII.get(X86::SEH_SetFrame))
-            .addImm(FramePtr)
-            .addImm(0)
-            .setMIFlag(MachineInstr::FrameSetup);
+        if (NeedsDwarfCFI) {
+          // Mark effective beginning of when frame pointer becomes valid.
+          // Define the current CFA to use the EBP/RBP register.
+          unsigned DwarfFramePtr = TRI->getDwarfRegNum(MachineFramePtr, true);
+          BuildCFI(MBB, MBBI, DL, MCCFIInstruction::createDefCfaRegister(
+                                      nullptr, DwarfFramePtr));
+        }
+
+        if (NeedsWinFPO) {
+          // .cv_fpo_setframe $FramePtr
+          HasWinCFI = true;
+          BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII.get(X86::SEH_SetFrame))
+              .addImm(FramePtr)
+              .addImm(0)
+              .setMIFlag(MachineInstr::FrameSetup);
+        }
       }
     }
   } else {
     assert(!IsFunclet && "funclets without FPs not yet implemented");
     NumBytes = StackSize - X86FI->getCalleeSavedFrameSize();
   }
 
   // Update the offset adjustment, which is mainly used by codeview to translate

llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/swift-async-win64.ll

+; RUN: llc -mtriple x86_64-unknown-windows-msvc %s -o - | FileCheck %s -check-prefix CHECK64
+; RUN: llc -mtriple i686-windows-msvc %s -o - | FileCheck %s -check-prefix CHECK32
+
+define void @simple(i8* swiftasync %context) "frame-pointer"="all" {
+  ret void
+}
+
+; CHECK64-LABEL: simple:
+; CHECK64: btsq    $60, %rbp
+; CHECK64: pushq   %rbp
+; CHECK64: pushq   %r14
+; CHECK64: leaq    8(%rsp), %rbp
+; [...]
+; CHECK64: addq    $16, %rsp
+; CHECK64: popq    %rbp
+; CHECK64: btrq    $60, %rbp
+; CHECK64: retq
+
+; CHECK32-LABEL simple:
+; CHECK32: movl    8(%ebp), [[TMP:%.*]]
+; CHECK32: movl    [[TMP]], {{.*}}(%ebp)
+
+define void @more_csrs(i8* swiftasync %context) "frame-pointer"="all" {
+  call void asm sideeffect "", "~{r15}"()
+  ret void
+}
+
+; CHECK64-LABEL: more_csrs:
+; CHECK64: btsq    $60, %rbp
+; CHECK64: pushq   %rbp
+; CHECK64: .seh_pushreg %rbp
+; CHECK64: pushq   %r14
+; CHECK64: .seh_pushreg %r14
+; CHECK64: leaq    8(%rsp), %rbp
+; CHECK64: subq    $8, %rsp
+; CHECK64: pushq   %r15
+; CHECK64: .seh_pushreg %r15
+; [...]
+; CHECK64: popq    %r15
+; CHECK64: addq    $16, %rsp
+; CHECK64: popq    %rbp
+; CHECK64: btrq    $60, %rbp
+; CHECK64: retq
+
+declare void @f(i32*)
+
+define void @locals(i8* swiftasync %context) "frame-pointer"="all" {
+  %var = alloca i32, i32 10
+  call void @f(i32* %var)
+  ret void
+}
+
+; CHECK64-LABEL: locals:
+; CHECK64: btsq    $60, %rbp
+; CHECK64: pushq   %rbp
+; CHECK64: .seh_pushreg %rbp
+; CHECK64: pushq   %r14
+; CHECK64: .seh_pushreg %r14
+; CHECK64: leaq    8(%rsp), %rbp
+; CHECK64: subq    $88, %rsp
+
+; CHECK64: leaq    -48(%rbp), %rcx
+; CHECK64: callq   f
+
+; CHECK64: addq    $80, %rsp
+; CHECK64: addq    $16, %rsp
+; CHECK64: popq    %rbp
+; CHECK64: btrq    $60, %rbp
+; CHECK64: retq
+
+define void @use_input_context(i8* swiftasync %context, i8** %ptr) "frame-pointer"="all" {
+  store i8* %context, i8** %ptr
+  ret void
+}
+
+; CHECK64-LABEL: use_input_context:
+; CHECK64: movq    %r14, (%rcx)
+
+declare i8** @llvm.swift.async.context.addr()
+
+define i8** @context_in_func() "frmae-pointer"="non-leaf" {
+  %ptr = call i8** @llvm.swift.async.context.addr()
+  ret i8** %ptr
+}
+
+; CHECK64-LABEL: context_in_func:
+; CHECK64: leaq    -8(%rbp), %rax
+
+; CHECK32-LABEL: context_in_func:
+; CHECK32: movl    %esp, %eax
+
+define void @write_frame_context(i8* swiftasync %context, i8* %new_context) "frame-pointer"="non-leaf" {
+  %ptr = call i8** @llvm.swift.async.context.addr()
+  store i8* %new_context, i8** %ptr
+  ret void
+}
+
+; CHECK64-LABEL: write_frame_context:
+; CHECK64: movq    %rbp, [[TMP:%.*]]
+; CHECK64: subq    $8, [[TMP]]
+; CHECK64: movq    %rcx, ([[TMP]])
+
+define void @simple_fp_elim(i8* swiftasync %context) "frame-pointer"="non-leaf" {
+  ret void
+}
+
+; CHECK64-LABEL: simple_fp_elim:
+; CHECK64-NOT: btsq

llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/swifttail-async-win64.ll

+; RUN: llc -mtriple x86_64-unknown-windows-msvc %s -o - | FileCheck %s
+
+declare swifttailcc void @callee()
+
+define swifttailcc void @swift_tail() {
+  call void asm "","~{r14}"()
+  tail call swifttailcc void @callee()
+  ret void
+}
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: swift_tail:
+; CHECK-NOT: popq %r14
+
+define void @has_swift_async(i8* swiftasync %contet) {
+  call void asm "","~{r14}"()
+  ret void
+}
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: has_swift_async:
+; CHECK: popq    %r14
+
+; It's impossible to get a tail call from a function without a swiftasync
+; parameter to one with unless the CC is swifttailcc. So it doesn't matter
+; whether r14 is callee-saved in this case.
+define void @calls_swift_async() {
+  call void asm "","~{r14}"()
+  tail call void @has_swift_async(i8* swiftasync null)
+  ret void
+}
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: calls_swift_async:
+; CHECK-NOT jmpq has_swift_async
+
+define swifttailcc void @no_preserve_swiftself() {
+  call void asm "","~{r13}"()
+  ret void
+}
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: no_preserve_swiftself:
+; CHECK-NOT: popq %r13
+
+declare swifttailcc i8* @swift_self(i8* swiftasync %context, i8* swiftself %self)
+
+define swiftcc i8* @call_swift_self(i8* swiftself %self, i8* %context) {
+  ; call void asm "","~{r13}"()
+  ; We get a push r13 but why not with the call below?
+  %res = call swifttailcc i8* @swift_self(i8* swiftasync %context, i8* swiftself %self)
+  ret i8* %res
+}
+
+; CHECK-LABEL: call_swift_self:
+; CHECK: pushq %r13