Details
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
Unit Tests
Event Timeline
| clang/unittests/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchersTraversalTest.cpp | ||
|---|---|---|
| 485 | I don't know how to create a lambda with a default ctor body. | |
| clang/include/clang/AST/RecursiveASTVisitor.h | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2065 | In principle there can be multiple declarations of the lambda call operator if we merge multiple lambdas from different modules; we should check for any declaration of the operator() here rather than the exact one that getLambdaCallOperator returns. I'd previously thought we could use isLambdaCallOperator here, but I think that's wrong: for a generic lambda, that would skip instantiations of the templated operator(), whereas I think you only want to skip the body of the primary template in that case, and still visit the instantiations, right? Eg, given: auto x = [](auto n) { return n; };
int n = x(0);... you'd want to skip the body of the template <lambda>::operator()(T), but you'd still want to visit the body of <lambda>::operator()<int>(int), right? | |
| clang/unittests/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchersTraversalTest.cpp | ||
| 485 | I think that's probably not actually possible, sorry for misleading you on that! You can introduce a copy constructor with a body (by giving A a non-trivial copy constructor), though, if you want to test that. | |
| clang/unittests/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchersTraversalTest.cpp | ||
|---|---|---|
| 485 | Oh, right you are. Looks good :) | |
In principle there can be multiple declarations of the lambda call operator if we merge multiple lambdas from different modules; we should check for any declaration of the operator() here rather than the exact one that getLambdaCallOperator returns.
I'd previously thought we could use isLambdaCallOperator here, but I think that's wrong: for a generic lambda, that would skip instantiations of the templated operator(), whereas I think you only want to skip the body of the primary template in that case, and still visit the instantiations, right? Eg, given:
auto x = [](auto n) { return n; }; int n = x(0);... you'd want to skip the body of the template <lambda>::operator()(T), but you'd still want to visit the body of <lambda>::operator()<int>(int), right?