Couple of tests to showcase what will be done and what to expect with ICV tracking.
Details
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
Event Timeline
Thanks! One comment for the FIXME.
llvm/test/Transforms/OpenMP/icv_tracking.ll | ||
---|---|---|
62 | I guess %5 should be replaced with min(%3, 10), right? We might want to use SCEV to represent the values and combine them. |
Nice. Great to have tests committed before the optimisation as it means the diff attached to that optimisation makes it really obvious what the transform did.
It might be worth removing some more of the noise from the IR, e.g. the 'noalias nocapture' stuff on the arguments is unlikely to be relevant.
Agreed. I already cleaned some stuff up. Will do more.
llvm/test/Transforms/OpenMP/icv_tracking.ll | ||
---|---|---|
62 | Not sure I understand why min(%3, 10)? Without any transformations %5 is 10. Maybe I'm missing something? Will look into using SCEV. |
llvm/test/Transforms/OpenMP/icv_tracking.ll | ||
---|---|---|
62 | In reality, it is a value smaller or equal to 10, I think. Let's say we have a quad core and the user sets the num_threads to 10, there are two reasonable outcomes. The runtime will cap it at 4, given that any more threads will most likely not help, or it will go with 10. Afaik, OpenMP doesn't guarantee 10 but not more than 10 if you set a limit. We might want to provide user hooks that simplify the logic, e.g., allow us to take 10, but otherwise min(10, %3) seems reasonable to me. WDYT? |
llvm/test/Transforms/OpenMP/icv_tracking.ll | ||
---|---|---|
62 | Oh, ok. Makes sense now. 10 was totally random. I'll update the comment to have min(10, %3). |
LGTM
llvm/test/Transforms/OpenMP/icv_tracking.ll | ||
---|---|---|
2 | Run it with old and new pass manager |
Run it with old and new pass manager