[lldb][nfc] remove overriden funcs with default impl

[kwk]

Summary

These SearchFilter methods all return true by their default
implementation:

virtual bool ModulePasses(const FileSpec &spec);
virtual bool ModulePasses(const lldb::ModuleSP &module_sp);
virtual bool AddressPasses(Address &addr);
virtual bool CompUnitPasses(FileSpec &fileSpec);
virtual bool CompUnitPasses(CompileUnit &compUnit);

That's why I've documented the default behavior and remove the overrides
(except for AddressPasses) in these SearchFilter-subclasses which all just
repeated the default implementation: SearchFilterByModule,
SearchFilterByModuleList.

[jankratochvil]

lldb/include/lldb/Core/SearchFilter.h

102 ↗

(On Diff #254736)

I am not against it but FYI in a paragraph above there is already written: The default implementation is "Everything Passes."
English: IMO missing "returns".

lldb/source/Core/SearchFilter.cpp

416

This comment will get lost. Maybe you could keep this override just due to the FIXME comment. Or keep the FIXME comment some other way there. Or file a Bugzilla tracking Bug instead.
It is there since: Initial checkin of lldb code from internal Apple repo.

542

Likewise.

[kwk]

• fix comment

[kwk]

Re-added AddressPasses with FIXME comment

[kwk]

Had some problem with my arc diff reporting that another git was running which it wasn't so I had to update the diff by hand with a bit of trouble.

lldb/include/lldb/Core/SearchFilter.h

102 ↗

(On Diff #254736)

Thank you for the missing "returns". I'd like to keep the comment.

lldb/source/Core/SearchFilter.cpp

416

I've checked the code myself to find out where it was coming from and found out that the FIXME is there for almost 10 years. I wonder if @lattner still remembers why it was there or if it can be removed. By the nature of the other default implementations below, I wonder if this was accidentally a left-over or should be put into SearchFilterByModule::CompUnitPasses as well?

[kwk]

@jankratochvil for now I've re-added the AddressPasses functions and the FIXME comment. Can you approve?

[jankratochvil]

LGTM, thanks for the cleanup.

In D77376#1961410, @kwk wrote:

so I had to update the diff by hand with a bit of trouble.

I was told here already it is better to use git diff -U999999999 as otherwise there is now Context not available. during this review. The line 416 comments are even not accessible in the diff now.

or should be put into SearchFilterByModule::CompUnitPasses as well?

CompUnitPasses is using SymbolContext::comp_unit which from my DWZ experience is many times not available. So for filtering by Modules the AddressPasses should be a more safe solution IMO.

[labath]

lldb/include/lldb/Core/SearchFilter.h

102 ↗

(On Diff #254736)

You can keep _a_ comment if you want, but this comment is even internally redundant. I don't see a need to mention overriding, saying "The default (base?) implementation returns true" should be clear enough.

[kwk]

• Simplify comments

[kwk]

@jankratochvil thanks for the tip.
@labath, addressed your comments and will now push it.

lldb/include/lldb/Core/SearchFilter.h

102 ↗

(On Diff #254736)

@labath. That is fine. I've changed the comment.

lldb/source/Core/SearchFilter.cpp

   return FileSpec::Match(m_module_spec, spec);
 }
 
+bool SearchFilterByModule::AddressPasses(Address &address) {
+  // FIXME: Not yet implemented
+  return true;
+}
+
 void SearchFilterByModule::Search(Searcher &searcher) {
   if (!m_target_sp)
     return;

   return m_module_spec_list.FindFileIndex(0, spec, true) != UINT32_MAX;
 }
 
+bool SearchFilterByModuleList::AddressPasses(Address &address) {
+  // FIXME: Not yet implemented
+  return true;
+}
+
 void SearchFilterByModuleList::Search(Searcher &searcher) {
   if (!m_target_sp)
     return;