We already do this for the flat and DS instructions, although it is
certainly uglier and more verbose.
This will allow using separate pattern definitions for extload and
zextload. Currently we get away with using a single PatFrag with
custom predicate code to check if the extension type is a zextload or
anyextload. The generic mechanism the global isel emitter understands
treats these as mutually exclusive. I was considering making the
pattern emitter accept zextload or sextload extensions for anyextload
patterns, but in global isel, the different extending loads have
distinct opcodes, and there is currently no mechanism for an opcode
matcher to try multiple (and there probably is very little need for
one beyond this case).