refactor of visitFADD for AllowNewConst cases

[mcberg2017]

Summary

Refactoring for all constant cases which require AllowNewConst and some staging for future fmf usage.

[mcberg2017]

This change does not modify testing...

[wristow]

lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp

10355

Both this if (Options.UnsafeFPMath && AllowNewConst) test and the test a dozen lines above are the same. Why break it into two sections?

[wristow]

lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp

10355

Ahhhh... I see, because one is in prep for NaNs, and one for reassoc/nsz.

[spatel]

I'm not sure how to test that potential late constant creation problem (see rL334977), but this change looks safe and does what the comment says, so LGTM.

lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp

SDValue DAGCombiner::visitFADD(SDNode *N) {
   // FIXME: Auto-upgrade the target/function-level option.
   if (Options.NoSignedZerosFPMath || N->getFlags().hasNoSignedZeros()) {
     // fold (fadd A, 0) -> A
     if (ConstantFPSDNode *N1C = isConstOrConstSplatFP(N1))
       if (N1C->isZero())
         return N0;
   }
 
-  // If 'unsafe math' is enabled, fold lots of things.
-  if (Options.UnsafeFPMath) {
-    // No FP constant should be created after legalization as Instruction
-    // Selection pass has a hard time dealing with FP constants.
-    bool AllowNewConst = (Level < AfterLegalizeDAG);
 
+  // TODO: fmf test for NaNs could be done here too
+  if (Options.UnsafeFPMath && AllowNewConst) {
+    // If allowed, fold (fadd (fneg x), x) -> 0.0
+    if (N0.getOpcode() == ISD::FNEG && N0.getOperand(0) == N1)
+      return DAG.getConstantFP(0.0, DL, VT);
+
+    // If allowed, fold (fadd x, (fneg x)) -> 0.0
+    if (N1.getOpcode() == ISD::FNEG && N1.getOperand(0) == N0)
+      return DAG.getConstantFP(0.0, DL, VT);
+  }
+
+  // If 'unsafe math' is enabled, fold lots of things.
+  // TODO: fmf testing for reassoc/nsz could be done here too
+  if (Options.UnsafeFPMath && AllowNewConst) {
     // fadd (fadd x, c1), c2 -> fadd x, c1 + c2
     if (N1CFP && N0.getOpcode() == ISD::FADD &&
         isConstantFPBuildVectorOrConstantFP(N0.getOperand(1))) {
       SDValue NewC = DAG.getNode(ISD::FADD, DL, VT, N0.getOperand(1), N1, Flags);
       return DAG.getNode(ISD::FADD, DL, VT, N0.getOperand(0), NewC, Flags);
     }
 
-    // If allowed, fold (fadd (fneg x), x) -> 0.0
-    if (AllowNewConst && N0.getOpcode() == ISD::FNEG && N0.getOperand(0) == N1)
-      return DAG.getConstantFP(0.0, DL, VT);
-
-    // If allowed, fold (fadd x, (fneg x)) -> 0.0
-    if (AllowNewConst && N1.getOpcode() == ISD::FNEG && N1.getOperand(0) == N0)
-      return DAG.getConstantFP(0.0, DL, VT);
-
     // We can fold chains of FADD's of the same value into multiplications.
     // This transform is not safe in general because we are reducing the number
     // of rounding steps.
     if (TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISD::FMUL, VT) && !N0CFP && !N1CFP) {
       if (N0.getOpcode() == ISD::FMUL) {
         bool CFP00 = isConstantFPBuildVectorOrConstantFP(N0.getOperand(0));
         bool CFP01 = isConstantFPBuildVectorOrConstantFP(N0.getOperand(1));
 
if (TLI.isOperationLegalOrCustom(ISD::FMUL, VT) && !N0CFP && !N1CFP) {
             N0.getOperand(0) == N0.getOperand(1) &&
             N1.getOperand(0) == N0.getOperand(0)) {
           SDValue NewCFP = DAG.getNode(ISD::FADD, DL, VT, N1.getOperand(1),
                                        DAG.getConstantFP(2.0, DL, VT), Flags);
           return DAG.getNode(ISD::FMUL, DL, VT, N1.getOperand(0), NewCFP, Flags);
         }
       }
 
-      if (N0.getOpcode() == ISD::FADD && AllowNewConst) {
+      if (N0.getOpcode() == ISD::FADD) {
         bool CFP00 = isConstantFPBuildVectorOrConstantFP(N0.getOperand(0));
         // (fadd (fadd x, x), x) -> (fmul x, 3.0)
         if (!CFP00 && N0.getOperand(0) == N0.getOperand(1) &&
             (N0.getOperand(0) == N1)) {
           return DAG.getNode(ISD::FMUL, DL, VT,
                              N1, DAG.getConstantFP(3.0, DL, VT), Flags);
         }
       }
 
-      if (N1.getOpcode() == ISD::FADD && AllowNewConst) {
+      if (N1.getOpcode() == ISD::FADD) {
         bool CFP10 = isConstantFPBuildVectorOrConstantFP(N1.getOperand(0));
         // (fadd x, (fadd x, x)) -> (fmul x, 3.0)
         if (!CFP10 && N1.getOperand(0) == N1.getOperand(1) &&
             N1.getOperand(0) == N0) {
           return DAG.getNode(ISD::FMUL, DL, VT,
                              N0, DAG.getConstantFP(3.0, DL, VT), Flags);
         }
       }
 
       // (fadd (fadd x, x), (fadd x, x)) -> (fmul x, 4.0)
-      if (AllowNewConst &&
-          N0.getOpcode() == ISD::FADD && N1.getOpcode() == ISD::FADD &&
+      if (N0.getOpcode() == ISD::FADD && N1.getOpcode() == ISD::FADD &&
           N0.getOperand(0) == N0.getOperand(1) &&
           N1.getOperand(0) == N1.getOperand(1) &&
           N0.getOperand(0) == N1.getOperand(0)) {
         return DAG.getNode(ISD::FMUL, DL, VT, N0.getOperand(0),
                            DAG.getConstantFP(4.0, DL, VT), Flags);
       }
     }
   } // enable-unsafe-fp-math