This is in preparation of https://reviews.llvm.org/D36052
Details
Diff Detail
- Build Status
Buildable 8735 Build 8735: arc lint + arc unit
Event Timeline
I definitely lik ethis direction. Minor comments about wording / phrasing of things below.
include/llvm/Passes/PassBuilder.h | ||
---|---|---|
74–77 | I don't think we want this to be so open ended. Until there is some *other* necessary predicate, we should scope this very narrowly so it isn't tempting to use for other things without careful consideration. I'd call this ThinLTOPhase. Also, I'd make it an enum class. | |
78–79 | Based on the above, this would likely become None with the comment that it indicates no ThinLTO behavior needed. | |
81–90 | And these can just be PreLink and PostLink as they'll have a qualifier when used: ThinLTOPhase::PreLink. I think the comments should also be minimal. The details of how PGO being listed here seem risky to just fall out of sync with the reality. I'd either say nothing (because PreLink seems pretty clear) or that they correspond to the pre-link phase of ThinLTO. |
LGTM with a comment wording tweak below. Thanks for he refactoring!
include/llvm/Passes/PassBuilder.h | ||
---|---|---|
236 | "the current optimization phase" -> "the current ThinLTO phase", here and below where the same phrasing is used. |
I don't think we want this to be so open ended. Until there is some *other* necessary predicate, we should scope this very narrowly so it isn't tempting to use for other things without careful consideration.
I'd call this ThinLTOPhase. Also, I'd make it an enum class.