It is possible that a function parameter does not have a name even in a function definition.
So we should not assert that function parameters always have names.
This patch lets the analysis give up on generating fix-its in cases where a function parameter of a definition has no name.
Later we can come up with a better solution, e.g., generating a name for the parameter.
There doesn't have to be a name anywhere, and if it's not there in the definition this usually means the parameter is unused. If it's unused, we won't ever fix it, and this also means that there's no need to give it a name. So I suspect that in the typical case the correct behavior is to just preserve the anonymous parameter as-is.
This is just my usual argument: I think the fixit should simply take the part that doesn't need fixing from the original code, and include it textually. In this case this would mean duplicating the text rather than simply not touching it, but that's probably still more precise than writing code from scratch.