I don't see a reason why not to. If we allows lookup functions by full names,
I can change the test case in D113930 to use lldb-test symbols --find=function --name=full::name --function-flags=full ...,
though the duplicate method decl prolem is still there for lldb-test symbols --dump-ast.
That's a seprate bug, we can fix it later.
Details
Details
- Reviewers
labath - Commits
- rG22ced33a2f76: [LLDB][NativePDB] Allow find functions by full names
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
This broke the windows bot:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/83/builds/12270
I'd like to get it back to green, so please address this ASAP or I'll follow up with a reverting change later today.
Comment Actions
Thanks, https://reviews.llvm.org/rG34d02fada28753221eda576e2f651f9b23c3f1af should fix it.
Comment Actions
@zequanwu : It looks like the bot is still broken: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/83/builds/12413
Comment Actions
The printed names are different between windows and linux. https://reviews.llvm.org/rGfe270ab061fa1200d1f7e121ac6671f7d24b73d6 would hopefully fix it.
Comment Actions
What is the reason for these differences? The test in question appears to be fairly hermetic (in-tree compiler and linker), so it sounds like something is going wrong inside lldb...