ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl not within a ClassTemplateDecl
represents an explicit instatiation of a template and so should be
handled as if it were a normal CXXRecordDecl. Unfortunately, having an
equivalent for FunctionTemplateDecl remains a TODO in ASTDumper's
VisitFunctionTemplateDecl, with all the explicit instantiations just
being emitted inside the FunctionTemplateDecl along with all the other
specializations, meaning we can't easily support explicit function
instantiations in update_cc_test_checks.
Details
Details
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
Drop the --llvm-bin test; only basic-cplusplus.test does that (which happened to be the one I used as a reference), and that only needs to be done for one file as it has no relation to the input.