Details
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
Event Timeline
llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/Inliner.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
842 | We have debug prints for negative decision, but not positive decision, so we may end up with a bunch of "function size: ..". Would it be more helpful to say "Function size: X after inlining Y" or something like that? |
llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/Inliner.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
842 | We actually have debug prints for positive decision. With the size printing, the debug log now looks like Inlining calls in: _ZN11opentracing2v24util6detail10dispatcherIRN8facebook7tracing11opentracing12_GLOBAL__N_112ValueVisitorENS0_5ValueENSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEEJDnPKcNS1_17recursive_wrapperISt6vectorISA_SaISA_EEEENSJ_ISt13unordered_mapISG_SA_St4hashISG_ESt8equal_toISG_ESaISt4pairIKSG_SA_EEEEEEE11apply_constERKSA_S9_ Function size: 11 Inlining (cost=always): always inline attribute, Call: %4 = call zeroext i1 @_ZNK11opentracing2v24util7variantIJbdlmNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEEDnPKcNS1_17recursive_wrapperISt6vectorINS0_5ValueESaISD_EEEENSB_ISt13unordered_mapIS8_SD_St4hashIS8_ESt8equal_toIS8_ESaISt4pairIKS8_SD_EEEEEEE2isIDnEEbv(%"class.opentracing::v2::util::variant"* nonnull %3), !dbg !35441 Function size: 13 Inlining (cost=always): always inline attribute, Call: %8 = call dereferenceable(8) i8** @_ZNK11opentracing2v24util7variantIJbdlmNSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEEDnPKcNS1_17recursive_wrapperISt6vectorINS0_5ValueESaISD_EEEENSB_ISt13unordered_mapIS8_SD_St4hashIS8_ESt8equal_toIS8_ESaISt4pairIKS8_SD_EEEEEEE3getIDnLPv0EEERKT_v(%"class.opentracing::v2::util::variant"* nonnull %3), !dbg !35458 Function size: 26 Inlining (cost=-35, threshold=375), Call: %20 = call dereferenceable(8) i8** @_ZN11opentracing2v24util6detail9unwrapperIDnE11apply_constERKDn(i8** nonnull dereferenceable(8) %19), !dbg !35486 Function size: 25 Inlining (cost=-15020, threshold=375), Call: call fastcc void @_ZNK8facebook7tracing11opentracing12_GLOBAL__N_112ValueVisitorclIDnEENSt7__cxx1112basic_stringIcSt11char_traitsIcESaIcEEET_(%"class.std::__cxx11::basic_string"* noalias %0), !dbg !35501 Function size: 31 Inlining (cost=-30, threshold=375), Call: call fastcc void @_ZSt7forwardIRN8facebook7tracing11opentracing12_GLOBAL__N_112ValueVisitorEEOT_RNSt16remove_referenceIS6_E4typeE() #26, !dbg !35617 Function size: 30 |
llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/Inliner.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
842 | Well, I think you are right. I was looking at an older version and it had debug prints for positive decision there. |
llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/Inliner.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
842 | I double checked the latest code base. The inliner advisor actually prints out positive decisions (see llvm::shouldInline) and the debug output with this change will look like Inlining calls in: foo Function size: 2 Inlining (cost=25, threshold=75), Call: call void @bar(i1 true) Function size: 3 Updated inlining SCC: (foo) Inlined an internal call edge and split an SCC, retaining this to avoid infinite inlining. Inlining calls in: foo Function size: 3 NOT Inlining (cost=never): recursive, Call: call void @foo() Inlining calls in: foo Function size: 3 NOT Inlining (cost=never): recursive, Call: call void @foo() Inlining calls in: bar Function size: 6 NOT Inlining (cost=never): recursive, Call: call void @foo() Inlining (cost=25, threshold=75), Call: call void @bar(i1 true) Function size: 7 NOT Inlining (cost=never): recursive, Call: call void @foo() Updated inlining SCC: (bar) Inlining calls in: test1 Function size: 3 Inlining (cost=25, threshold=75), Call: call void @bar(i1 true) Function size: 4 Inlining (cost=25, threshold=75), Call: call void @bar(i1 false) Function size: 5 NOT Inlining (cost=never): recursive, Call: call void @foo() NOT Inlining (cost=never): recursive, Call: call void @foo() Updated inlining SCC: (test1) Inlining calls in: test2 Function size: 3 Inlining (cost=-30, threshold=75), Call: call void @noop() Function size: 2 Inlining (cost=-30, threshold=75), Call: call void @noop() [ "CUSTOM_OPERAND_BUNDLE"() ] Updated inlining SCC: (test2) Inlining calls in: test3 Function size: 2 NOT Inlining (cost=never): recursive call, Call: call void @test3() #0 |
llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/Inliner.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
842 | ok, thanks for checking. nit: use "Size after inlining"? From the print out above, currently it looks more like size of the inlinee. |
We have debug prints for negative decision, but not positive decision, so we may end up with a bunch of "function size: ..". Would it be more helpful to say "Function size: X after inlining Y" or something like that?