I skimmed the existing users of these matchers and don't see any problems (eg, the caller assumes the matched value was a select instruction without checking).
So I think we can generalize the matching to allow the new intrinsics or the cmp+select idioms.
I did not find any unit tests for the matchers, so added some basics there. The instsimplify tests are adapted from existing tests for the cmp+select pattern and cover the folds in simplifyICmpWithMinMax().