The cmp math test is inspired by memcmp() patterns seen in D75840. I know there's at least 1 related fold we can do here if both values are sext'd, but I'm not seeing a way to generalize further.
I know we have some other bool math patterns that we want to reduce, but that might require fixing the bogus transforms noted in D72396.
Alive proof translations of the regression tests:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/zGWi
Name: demand add 1 %xz = zext i1 %x to i32 %ys = sext i1 %y to i32 %sub = add i32 %xz, %ys %r = lshr i32 %sub, 31 => %notx = xor i1 %x, 1 %and = and i1 %y, %notx %r = zext i1 %and to i32 Name: demand add 2 %xz = zext i1 %x to i5 %ys = sext i1 %y to i5 %sub = add i5 %xz, %ys %r = and i5 %sub, 16 => %notx = xor i1 %x, 1 %and = and i1 %y, %notx %r = select i1 %and, i5 -16, i5 0 Name: demand add 3 %xz = zext i1 %x to i8 %ys = sext i1 %y to i8 %a = add i8 %ys, %xz %r = ashr i8 %a, 7 => %notx = xor i1 %x, 1 %and = and i1 %y, %notx %r = sext i1 %and to i8 Name: cmp math %gt = icmp ugt i32 %x, %y %lt = icmp ult i32 %x, %y %xz = zext i1 %gt to i32 %yz = zext i1 %lt to i32 %s = sub i32 %xz, %yz %r = lshr i32 %s, 31 => %r = zext i1 %lt to i32
Wouldn't it be sufficient to check that the LSB is not demanded? I don't think we care that specifically the MSB is demanded, any of the top bits could be.