This saves an alias() call for must sets.
[Part of a series of clean-up patches]
Details
- Reviewers
chandlerc reames mkazantsev
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rL LLVM
- Build Status
Buildable 27786 Build 27785: arc lint + arc unit
Event Timeline
lib/Analysis/AliasSetTracker.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
76 | I don't believe this is correct. The problem is that you're replacing an alias check between two sets with one between a one set and a pointer. We know that the pointer must become a member of the set, and with your new API, we know that it's a member of that set. However, we *don't* know it's a member of the other set. Consider adding the pointer {p, 8} to the following sets: Your code would conclude that the result set {{p, 16}} is MustAlias, which is incorrect. A cleanup which would fix this would be to add the pointer *before* merging alias sets, not after. | |
194–196 | The changes in signature to this function are obviously useful regardless of the rest of the patch. Feel free to separate them and commit without further review. |
lib/Analysis/AliasSetTracker.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
313–314 | I see your point above, thanks for noticing! if (AR != MustAlias) FoundSet.Alias = SetMayAlias; What do you think? |
lib/Analysis/AliasSetTracker.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
76 | On a second review, I think this is correct without the change I suggested below. When deciding to merge 2 sets, we do check aliasing of the pointer, so we know it belongs to both sets. The issue that may come up, as you suggest, is that the merged set may no longer be MustAlias, because we don't check the first "FoundSet" at the callsite. Now, after D56613, even that check will go away. But it's being replaced with the intersection of alias information of *all* sets that were merged, including that first "FoundSet". So, if MustAlias is not found for *all* merged sets, then the set is downgraded to MayAlias. I believe that is correct. Did I miss something? |
(peanut gallery comments)
lib/Analysis/AliasSetTracker.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
194–196 | +1, happy to see that factored out. |
lib/Analysis/AliasSetTracker.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
76 | Ping. |
Response to outstanding discussion point inline, but I want to suggest an alternate approach for the review so that we can make progress.
The entire concern here is because we can try to merge two alias sets which *don't* contain the exact pointerrec triggering the merging. Let's just stop doing that. If we simple called addPointer and addUnknown on each AliasSet we found which aliased *before* merging, all of our concerns disappear. This is what the two callers of this function - aside from merge all - actually want anyways, so let's just do that. It should be a simple refactor, followed by a rebase of this patch, at which point this patch becomes obviously correct. In fact, you can the entirely remove the problematic if block from mergeSetIn, rather than try to optimize it's performance.
lib/Analysis/AliasSetTracker.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
76 | Reading back through the (original) code, I believe the problem was valid. Here are two example codepaths: The core problem is that the first AS is never downgraded to MayAlias if the pointer added to it aliases, but does not may alias. We never call mergeSetIn to that first set. Note that in both cases, the instruction being queried for *has not* been added to any alias set before merging. Also note that the alias result passed in is with respect to *one* of the two sets, not both. |
lib/Analysis/AliasSetTracker.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
76 | Refining this slightly, look specifically at the codepath in getAliasSetFor where we have an existing AS, but with the wrong Size and/or AA info. We update the info on the set, and then call mergeAliasSetForPointer, but we never actually downgrade the AS which corresponds to the entry to MayAlias. Or to say it differently, the result of merging two alias sets is wrong when both are MustAlias w/the pointer, and this is a codepath which exposes that bug to it's caller in turn. |
I'm sorry, I don't really understand your alternative approach.
If we're adding the pointer to *all* sets aliased *before* merging, we will have that pointer duplicated to the number of aliasing sets. We never remove pointers. And these are not real sets, they're lists. They're intentionally implemented this way to make merging fast. We can't remove duplicates without walking the whole list.
Could you clarify?
I've updated the patch to essentially avoid the problem on the code path which updates the size. This should match existing behavior.
lib/Analysis/AliasSetTracker.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
76 | Let me try to explain this back to see if we're on the same page. When we call addUnknown, we always call addUnknownInst which sets the set to MayAlias always, so no issue here. When we call getAliasSetFor, then call mergeAliasSetsForPointer, then follow a code path that also calls addPointer afterwards, all is good. There is one call path where we don't call addPointer afterwards. That's when we update the size and/or AA, then attempt to merge sets. What can happen in this scenario:
Is this right? Assuming yes, is 3. valid behavior? |
lib/Analysis/AliasSetTracker.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
76 | The concern I have is about the codepath you describe as "When we call getAliasSetFor, then call mergeAliasSetsForPointer, then follow a code path that also calls addPointer afterwards, all is good." I'm not at all sure that codepath is correct since it allows us to construct an incorrect intermediate result before calling addPointer. However, when trying to further write up an explanation for the case which concerns me, I think I've come to an interesting conclusion. I think the piece of code you're trying to improve here is simply redundant and can be removed. For the must alias check in the original code to trigger, we must have constructed two alias sets (AS1, AS2) which are both individually mustalias and also at least mayalias w/respect to some memory location "ML". In order for the result of merging these three values to mustalias, then "ML" must be mustalias w/both AS1 and AS2. Given AS1 and AS2 are (by assumption of construction) noalias w/each other, that would seem to be a contradiction. I'm testing a patch at a moment w/an assertion of to test the previous theory. I've run across what appears to be an unrelated bug though, so I need to fix that before confirming my theory. |
lib/Analysis/AliasSetTracker.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
76 | SG, thank you for following up! I'll remove this cleanup patch as dependency to unblock the others in the mean time. |
I don't believe this is correct. The problem is that you're replacing an alias check between two sets with one between a one set and a pointer. We know that the pointer must become a member of the set, and with your new API, we know that it's a member of that set. However, we *don't* know it's a member of the other set.
Consider adding the pointer {p, 8} to the following sets:
{{p, 16}}, and {{p, 8}}.
Your code would conclude that the result set {{p, 16}} is MustAlias, which is incorrect.
A cleanup which would fix this would be to add the pointer *before* merging alias sets, not after.