Expand comment for MinGW driver.
Should be either "consists of" or "comes with"
differnet -> different
translate -> translates
calls lld/COFF driver -> calls the lld/COFF driver?
run lld/COFF linker -> run the lld/COFF linker?
implemented -> implements?
+1 to the rest of @smeenai's comments
I don't see anything wrong with what's written here at the moment.
It sounds more natural in the present tense to me (it flows better from the previous part of the sentence), but yeah, it's fine either way.
@ruiu Do you have time to finish this one, there shouldn't be much to do?
Corrected @smeenai's review comments.
Feel free to commit.