Trivial patch that cleans up some function signatures from unused parameters.

[zturner]

Summary

No functionality change. I can probably just submit this with no review, but given that I don't have too many patches yet, i'll err on the side of caution.

[dblaikie]

Have you looked at the commit history of why this was present in the first place? Given that there's not much you can /do/ with a MutexGuard, I'm guessing the original author had it this way to indicate which functions had to be called with a MutexGuard already owned... - a poor man's thread safety check, as it were.

Not that I necessarily agree, but might be useful to understand (if it had previously had a use and was since removed, or at least the person who added it (assuming it was added for the reason I guessed above) is long gone, or if they're a current contributor maybe check with them to see why it was there)

But that's up to you - I'd probably be happy committing this without doing that work & happy to sign off on you doing the same. Maybe at least add comments to the functions you're removing the parameter from to document the precondition that the lock must be held, or maybe you could even add clang's thread safety attributes... (which would also mean turning on the warning in the build systems, etc, probably... blah blah blah)

[zturner]

The previous revision goes back over 8 years, and the commiter (Reid Spencer) doesn't seem to be active anymore. I thought about adding some comments to the methods, but really that comes down to adding a comment to every method of ExecutionEngineState, because those are all the methods that this dummy-parameter was being passed to. In other words, access to the entire ExecutionEngineState object is serialized. But this is already clear IMO because that is actually the whole purpose of the class, as described by the comment at lines 56 and 57 of ExecutionEngine.h

[dblaikie]

In D4162#8, @zturner wrote:

The previous revision goes back over 8 years, and the commiter (Reid Spencer) doesn't seem to be active anymore. I thought about adding some comments to the methods, but really that comes down to adding a comment to every method of ExecutionEngineState, because those are all the methods that this dummy-parameter was being passed to. In other words, access to the entire ExecutionEngineState object is serialized. But this is already clear IMO because that is actually the whole purpose of the class, as described by the comment at lines 56 and 57 of ExecutionEngine.h

Fair enough. Sounds good to me then. It's not like, even if it is that idiom, it's one we subscribe to with any consistency in LLVM so it seems of little value.

(for my money, one day, we'll have a safe<T> (I'm sure there are already better names for this, probably under standardization as we speak) where you access it only by passing in a lambda:

s.do_stuff([](T& t) { ... });

so you can't forget to lock it, the safe<T> acquires a lock, then calls the lambda with the underlying object and the lock held. Short of leaking the T out there, you can't go far wrong)

[zturner]

Closed by commit rL211054 (authored by @zturner).

include/llvm/ExecutionEngine/ExecutionEngine.h

private:
   /// used to convert raw addresses into the LLVM global value that is emitted
   /// at the address.  This map is not computed unless getGlobalValueAtAddress
   /// is called at some point.
   std::map<void *, AssertingVH<const GlobalValue> > GlobalAddressReverseMap;
 
 public:
   ExecutionEngineState(ExecutionEngine &EE);
 
-  GlobalAddressMapTy &getGlobalAddressMap(const MutexGuard &) {
+  GlobalAddressMapTy &getGlobalAddressMap() {
     return GlobalAddressMap;
   }
 
   std::map<void*, AssertingVH<const GlobalValue> > &
-  getGlobalAddressReverseMap(const MutexGuard &) {
+  getGlobalAddressReverseMap() {
     return GlobalAddressReverseMap;
   }
 
   /// \brief Erase an entry from the mapping table.
   ///
   /// \returns The address that \p ToUnmap was happed to.
-  void *RemoveMapping(const MutexGuard &, const GlobalValue *ToUnmap);
+  void *RemoveMapping(const GlobalValue *ToUnmap);
 };
 
 /// \brief Abstract interface for implementation execution of LLVM modules,
 /// designed to support both interpreter and just-in-time (JIT) compiler
 /// implementations.
 class ExecutionEngine {
   /// The state object holding the global address mapping, which must be
   /// accessed synchronously.

lib/ExecutionEngine/ExecutionEngine.cpp

Function *ExecutionEngine::FindFunctionNamed(const char *FnName) {
   for (unsigned i = 0, e = Modules.size(); i != e; ++i) {
     if (Function *F = Modules[i]->getFunction(FnName))
       return F;
   }
   return nullptr;
 }
 
 
-void *ExecutionEngineState::RemoveMapping(const MutexGuard &,
-                                          const GlobalValue *ToUnmap) {
+void *ExecutionEngineState::RemoveMapping(const GlobalValue *ToUnmap) {
   GlobalAddressMapTy::iterator I = GlobalAddressMap.find(ToUnmap);
   void *OldVal;
 
   // FIXME: This is silly, we shouldn't end up with a mapping -> 0 in the
   // GlobalAddressMap.
   if (I == GlobalAddressMap.end())
     OldVal = nullptr;
   else {
     OldVal = I->second;
     GlobalAddressMap.erase(I);
   }
 
   GlobalAddressReverseMap.erase(OldVal);
   return OldVal;
 }
 
 void ExecutionEngine::addGlobalMapping(const GlobalValue *GV, void *Addr) {
   MutexGuard locked(lock);
 
   DEBUG(dbgs() << "JIT: Map \'" << GV->getName()
         << "\' to [" << Addr << "]\n";);
-  void *&CurVal = EEState.getGlobalAddressMap(locked)[GV];
+  void *&CurVal = EEState.getGlobalAddressMap()[GV];
   assert((!CurVal || !Addr) && "GlobalMapping already established!");
   CurVal = Addr;
 
   // If we are using the reverse mapping, add it too.
-  if (!EEState.getGlobalAddressReverseMap(locked).empty()) {
+  if (!EEState.getGlobalAddressReverseMap().empty()) {
     AssertingVH<const GlobalValue> &V =
-      EEState.getGlobalAddressReverseMap(locked)[Addr];
+      EEState.getGlobalAddressReverseMap()[Addr];
     assert((!V || !GV) && "GlobalMapping already established!");
     V = GV;
   }
 }
 
 void ExecutionEngine::clearAllGlobalMappings() {
   MutexGuard locked(lock);
 
-  EEState.getGlobalAddressMap(locked).clear();
-  EEState.getGlobalAddressReverseMap(locked).clear();
+  EEState.getGlobalAddressMap().clear();
+  EEState.getGlobalAddressReverseMap().clear();
 }
 
 void ExecutionEngine::clearGlobalMappingsFromModule(Module *M) {
   MutexGuard locked(lock);
 
   for (Module::iterator FI = M->begin(), FE = M->end(); FI != FE; ++FI)
-    EEState.RemoveMapping(locked, FI);
+    EEState.RemoveMapping(FI);
   for (Module::global_iterator GI = M->global_begin(), GE = M->global_end();
        GI != GE; ++GI)
-    EEState.RemoveMapping(locked, GI);
+    EEState.RemoveMapping(GI);
 }
 
 void *ExecutionEngine::updateGlobalMapping(const GlobalValue *GV, void *Addr) {
   MutexGuard locked(lock);
 
   ExecutionEngineState::GlobalAddressMapTy &Map =
-    EEState.getGlobalAddressMap(locked);
+    EEState.getGlobalAddressMap();
 
   // Deleting from the mapping?
   if (!Addr)
-    return EEState.RemoveMapping(locked, GV);
+    return EEState.RemoveMapping(GV);
 
   void *&CurVal = Map[GV];
   void *OldVal = CurVal;
 
-  if (CurVal && !EEState.getGlobalAddressReverseMap(locked).empty())
-    EEState.getGlobalAddressReverseMap(locked).erase(CurVal);
+  if (CurVal && !EEState.getGlobalAddressReverseMap().empty())
+    EEState.getGlobalAddressReverseMap().erase(CurVal);
   CurVal = Addr;
 
   // If we are using the reverse mapping, add it too.
-  if (!EEState.getGlobalAddressReverseMap(locked).empty()) {
+  if (!EEState.getGlobalAddressReverseMap().empty()) {
     AssertingVH<const GlobalValue> &V =
-      EEState.getGlobalAddressReverseMap(locked)[Addr];
+      EEState.getGlobalAddressReverseMap()[Addr];
     assert((!V || !GV) && "GlobalMapping already established!");
     V = GV;
   }
   return OldVal;
 }
 
 void *ExecutionEngine::getPointerToGlobalIfAvailable(const GlobalValue *GV) {
   MutexGuard locked(lock);
 
   ExecutionEngineState::GlobalAddressMapTy::iterator I =
-    EEState.getGlobalAddressMap(locked).find(GV);
-  return I != EEState.getGlobalAddressMap(locked).end() ? I->second : nullptr;
+    EEState.getGlobalAddressMap().find(GV);
+  return I != EEState.getGlobalAddressMap().end() ? I->second : nullptr;
 }
 
 const GlobalValue *ExecutionEngine::getGlobalValueAtAddress(void *Addr) {
   MutexGuard locked(lock);
 
   // If we haven't computed the reverse mapping yet, do so first.
-  if (EEState.getGlobalAddressReverseMap(locked).empty()) {
+  if (EEState.getGlobalAddressReverseMap().empty()) {
     for (ExecutionEngineState::GlobalAddressMapTy::iterator
-         I = EEState.getGlobalAddressMap(locked).begin(),
-         E = EEState.getGlobalAddressMap(locked).end(); I != E; ++I)
-      EEState.getGlobalAddressReverseMap(locked).insert(std::make_pair(
+         I = EEState.getGlobalAddressMap().begin(),
+         E = EEState.getGlobalAddressMap().end(); I != E; ++I)
+      EEState.getGlobalAddressReverseMap().insert(std::make_pair(
                                                           I->second, I->first));
   }
 
   std::map<void *, AssertingVH<const GlobalValue> >::iterator I =
-    EEState.getGlobalAddressReverseMap(locked).find(Addr);
-  return I != EEState.getGlobalAddressReverseMap(locked).end() ? I->second : nullptr;
+    EEState.getGlobalAddressReverseMap().find(Addr);
+  return I != EEState.getGlobalAddressReverseMap().end() ? I->second : nullptr;
 }
 
 namespace {
 class ArgvArray {
   char *Array;
   std::vector<char*> Values;
 public:
   ArgvArray() : Array(nullptr) {}
ExecutionEngine *EngineBuilder::create(TargetMachine *TM) {
   return nullptr;
 }
 
 void *ExecutionEngine::getPointerToGlobal(const GlobalValue *GV) {
   if (Function *F = const_cast<Function*>(dyn_cast<Function>(GV)))
     return getPointerToFunction(F);
 
   MutexGuard locked(lock);
-  if (void *P = EEState.getGlobalAddressMap(locked)[GV])
+  if (void *P = EEState.getGlobalAddressMap()[GV])
     return P;
 
   // Global variable might have been added since interpreter started.
   if (GlobalVariable *GVar =
           const_cast<GlobalVariable *>(dyn_cast<GlobalVariable>(GV)))
     EmitGlobalVariable(GVar);
   else
     llvm_unreachable("Global hasn't had an address allocated yet!");
 
-  return EEState.getGlobalAddressMap(locked)[GV];
+  return EEState.getGlobalAddressMap()[GV];
 }
 
 /// \brief Converts a Constant* into a GenericValue, including handling of
 /// ConstantExpr values.
 GenericValue ExecutionEngine::getConstantValue(const Constant *C) {
   // If its undefined, return the garbage.
   if (isa<UndefValue>(C)) {
     GenericValue Result;