Convert a vselect into a concat_vector if possible

[filcab]

Summary

If both vector args to vselect are concat_vectors and the condition is
constant and picks half a vector from each argument, convert the vselect
into a concat_vectors.

Added tests.

[delena]

lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp

17876 ↗

(On Diff #9818)

You do not check that the types are legal. On what stage this optimization should happen? <2 x float> that you take in your test is illegal.

[filcab]

Actually, seeing as it's generic, maybe I should move it to a more generic part of DAGCombiner, instead of the X86 backend.

What do you think, Elena? Nadav?

Filipe

lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp

17876 ↗

(On Diff #9818)

This is a generic optimization, which allows us to eliminate a vselect and replace it with a simpler concat_vectors, that's why I'm doing it before legalize types.

[hfinkel]

Moving this to DAGCombine makes sense to me.

lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp

17845 ↗

(On Diff #9818)

Does this do with right thing is BottomHalf is undef? It seems like you'd want to pick the first non-undef operand (and similarly with TopHalf below).

[filcab]

Moved the transform to DAGCombine.cpp, since it's generic, not X86 specific.

Also added the asserts Nadav requested and addressed the bug pointed out by Hal.

Nadav: Merging the loops would make for a big, complicated mess, instead
of two small, simple loops. I'd prefer to keep them separated, if you
don't mind.

[hfinkel]

lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp

4634 ↗

(On Diff #9860)

Are you sure this is always true on all possible code paths? If you are sure, please add a comment explaining where this is handled and why it will always happen first. Otherwise, please just make this a normal check.

[filcab]

If half is undef, and the other half is X (either true or false), this will
fall under the if statements before the call to this function in
visitSELECT. Around line 4707 (isBuildVectorAll{Zeros,Ones}). I also added
a comment at the call site of this function.

Filipe

[hfinkel]

• Original Message -----

From: "Filipe Cabecinhas" <[e-mail]>
To: "filcab+llvm phabricator" <[e-mail]>, [e-mail], "elena demikhovsky"
<[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail], [e-mail]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 2:48:17 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Convert a vselect into a concat_vector if possible

If half is undef, and the other half is X (either true or false),
this will
fall under the if statements before the call to this function in
visitSELECT. Around line 4707 (isBuildVectorAll{Zeros,Ones}). I also
added
a comment at the call site of this function.

Ah, right. isBuildVectorAllZeros also skips undefs.

-Hal

Filipe

http://reviews.llvm.org/D3916

[hfinkel]

lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp

4637 ↗

(On Diff #9860)

Why does operand 0 derive from operand 1 of the inputs?

[filcab]

Fixed a bug pointed by Hal Finkel, when returning the new concat_vectors

The code was doing the exact opposite of what it should.
I also added the specific registers to the test, in a way that accounts for some order change from the instruction scheduling.

I'm having a problem in making this test generic, though. Should I do a test for some additional architectures? The test/CodeGen/Generic directory only seems to check that llc doesn't error out when running on it. But I see no way to test this optimization without actually looking at the code.

Should I do more tests? Any way to check this that I didn't think about?

Thanks,

• Filipe

[hfinkel]

Aside from fixing up the test, this LGTM.

test/CodeGen/X86/vselect.ll

269 ↗

(On Diff #9902)

I think can be made a little more specific. You know what the input registers are (because they're dictated by the calling convention), so you can do something like this:

; CHECK-DAG: movlhps %xmm2, %xmm{{[01]}}
; CHECK-DAG: movlhps %xmm3, %xmm{{[01]}}

(where the CHECK-DAGs can match in either order). Because the add is commutative, it is hard to pattern match the resulting registers in a stable way (because they could be flipped). If you make the test use a subtract (so that the correct order is fixed), then we can be even more specific:

; CHECK-DAG: movlhps %xmm2, %[[REG1:[xmm[01]]]]
; CHECK-DAG: movlhps %xmm3, %[[REG2:[xmm[01]]]]
; CHECK-NEXT: subps [[REG1]], [[REG2]]

(or something like that).

[filcab]

Thanks, I didn't remember check-dag. Btw, if we use check-dag, we wouldn't
need the %xmm{{[01]}} regex either! unless I'm looking at it wrong.

I'll commit later today.

Thank you,

Filipe

[filcab]

Closed by commit rL209929 (authored by @filcab).

llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp

std::pair<SDValue, SDValue> SplitVSETCC(const SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
   std::tie(RL, RH) = DAG.SplitVectorOperand(N, 1);
 
   Lo = DAG.getNode(N->getOpcode(), DL, LoVT, LL, RL, N->getOperand(2));
   Hi = DAG.getNode(N->getOpcode(), DL, HiVT, LH, RH, N->getOperand(2));
 
   return std::make_pair(Lo, Hi);
 }
 
+// This function assumes all the vselect's arguments are CONCAT_VECTOR
+// nodes and that the condition is a BV of ConstantSDNodes (or undefs).
+static SDValue ConvertSelectToConcatVector(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
+  SDLoc dl(N);
+  SDValue Cond = N->getOperand(0);
+  SDValue LHS = N->getOperand(1);
+  SDValue RHS = N->getOperand(2);
+  MVT VT = N->getSimpleValueType(0);
+  int NumElems = VT.getVectorNumElements();
+  assert(LHS.getOpcode() == ISD::CONCAT_VECTORS &&
+         RHS.getOpcode() == ISD::CONCAT_VECTORS &&
+         Cond.getOpcode() == ISD::BUILD_VECTOR);
+
+  // We're sure we have an even number of elements due to the
+  // concat_vectors we have as arguments to vselect.
+  // Skip BV elements until we find one that's not an UNDEF
+  // After we find an UNDEF element, keep looping until we get to half the
+  // length of the BV and see if all the non-undef nodes are the same.
+  ConstantSDNode *BottomHalf = nullptr;
+  for (int i = 0; i < NumElems / 2; ++i) {
+    if (Cond->getOperand(i)->getOpcode() == ISD::UNDEF)
+      continue;
+
+    if (BottomHalf == nullptr)
+      BottomHalf = cast<ConstantSDNode>(Cond.getOperand(i));
+    else if (Cond->getOperand(i).getNode() != BottomHalf)
+      return SDValue();
+  }
+
+  // Do the same for the second half of the BuildVector
+  ConstantSDNode *TopHalf = nullptr;
+  for (int i = NumElems / 2; i < NumElems; ++i) {
+    if (Cond->getOperand(i)->getOpcode() == ISD::UNDEF)
+      continue;
+
+    if (TopHalf == nullptr)
+      TopHalf = cast<ConstantSDNode>(Cond.getOperand(i));
+    else if (Cond->getOperand(i).getNode() != TopHalf)
+      return SDValue();
+  }
+
+  assert(TopHalf && BottomHalf &&
+         "One half of the selector was all UNDEFs and the other was all the "
+         "same value. This should have been addressed before this function.");
+  return DAG.getNode(
+      ISD::CONCAT_VECTORS, dl, VT,
+      BottomHalf->isNullValue() ? RHS->getOperand(0) : LHS->getOperand(0),
+      TopHalf->isNullValue() ? RHS->getOperand(1) : LHS->getOperand(1));
+}
+
 SDValue DAGCombiner::visitVSELECT(SDNode *N) {
   SDValue N0 = N->getOperand(0);
   SDValue N1 = N->getOperand(1);
   SDValue N2 = N->getOperand(2);
   SDLoc DL(N);
 
   // Canonicalize integer abs.
   // vselect (setg[te] X,  0),  X, -X ->
SDValue DAGCombiner::visitVSELECT(SDNode *N) {
 
   // Fold (vselect (build_vector all_ones), N1, N2) -> N1
   if (ISD::isBuildVectorAllOnes(N0.getNode()))
     return N1;
   // Fold (vselect (build_vector all_zeros), N1, N2) -> N2
   if (ISD::isBuildVectorAllZeros(N0.getNode()))
     return N2;
 
+  // The ConvertSelectToConcatVector function is assuming both the above
+  // checks for (vselect (build_vector all{ones,zeros) ...) have been made
+  // and addressed.
+  if (N1.getOpcode() == ISD::CONCAT_VECTORS &&
+      N2.getOpcode() == ISD::CONCAT_VECTORS &&
+      ISD::isBuildVectorOfConstantSDNodes(N0.getNode())) {
+    SDValue CV = ConvertSelectToConcatVector(N, DAG);
+    if (CV.getNode())
+      return CV;
+  }
+
   return SDValue();
 }
 
 SDValue DAGCombiner::visitSELECT_CC(SDNode *N) {
   SDValue N0 = N->getOperand(0);
   SDValue N1 = N->getOperand(1);
   SDValue N2 = N->getOperand(2);
   SDValue N3 = N->getOperand(3);

llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/Generic/select.ll

 
 ; Test case for scalarising a 1 element vselect
 ;
 define <1 x i32> @checkScalariseVSELECT(<1 x i32> %a, <1 x i32> %b) {
         %cond = icmp uge <1 x i32> %a, %b
         %s = select <1 x i1> %cond, <1 x i32> %a, <1 x i32> %b
         ret <1 x i32> %s
 }
-

llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/vselect.ll

 }
 ; CHECK-LABEL: test25
 ; CHECK-NOT: psllw
 ; CHECK-NOT: psraw
 ; CHECK-NOT: xorps
 ; CHECK: movsd
 ; CHECK: ret
 
+define <4 x float> @select_of_shuffles_0(<2 x float> %a0, <2 x float> %b0, <2 x float> %a1, <2 x float> %b1) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: select_of_shuffles_0
+; CHECK-DAG: movlhps %xmm2, [[REGA:%xmm[0-9]+]]
+; CHECK-DAG: movlhps %xmm3, [[REGB:%xmm[0-9]+]]
+; CHECK: subps [[REGB]], [[REGA]]
+  %1 = shufflevector <2 x float> %a0, <2 x float> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1, i32 undef, i32 undef>
+  %2 = shufflevector <2 x float> %a1, <2 x float> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 undef, i32 undef, i32 0, i32 1>
+  %3 = select <4 x i1> <i1 false, i1 false, i1 true, i1 true>, <4 x float> %2, <4 x float> %1
+  %4 = shufflevector <2 x float> %b0, <2 x float> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1, i32 undef, i32 undef>
+  %5 = shufflevector <2 x float> %b1, <2 x float> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 undef, i32 undef, i32 0, i32 1>
+  %6 = select <4 x i1> <i1 false, i1 false, i1 true, i1 true>, <4 x float> %5, <4 x float> %4
+  %7 = fsub <4 x float> %3, %6
+  ret <4 x float> %7
+}