This helps in cases involving bitfields where an AND is exposed by legalization.
Details
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rL LLVM
Event Timeline
lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
7477 | How often are cases from each operand occurring? Since we canonicalize constants to the RHS would it be performant to test that first? |
It's not this patch's fault of course, but that set -> sbb transform looks like a regression for every CPU that I checked in Agner's tables (sbb has higher latency and/or less throughput).
Should we fix that first?
How often are cases from each operand occurring? Since we canonicalize constants to the RHS would it be performant to test that first?
The cases affected here are all AND with a constant mask. Should I special-case constants, or just rearrange order of the checks?
It's not this patch's fault of course, but that set -> sbb transform looks like a regression for every CPU that I checked in Agner's tables (sbb has higher latency and/or less throughput). Should we fix that first?
I took a brief look, but there isn't any obvious cause. Maybe some x86 combine interacting badly with the fact that AVX-512 makes i1 a legal type.
No problem - I'm rummaging around down here, so I'll try to find it. I don't think bogus sbb lowering is worth holding up this patch. Once Simon's concern is addressed, this should be good.
lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
7477 | Does this still work with a check using isConstOrConstSplat(V.getOperand(1)) ? If so I'd go with that as what you have right now is probably overkill. |
LGTM with one minor
test/CodeGen/X86/illegal-bitfield-loadstore.ll | ||
---|---|---|
94 | Please can you remove the old ACHECK lines? The update script won't touch comments it doesn't recognise, including unknown filecheck prefixes. |
How often are cases from each operand occurring? Since we canonicalize constants to the RHS would it be performant to test that first?