This will later be used by ThinLTOBitcodeWriter to add copies of readnone
functions to the regular LTO module.
Details
Diff Detail
- Build Status
Buildable 3759 Build 3759: arc lint + arc unit
Event Timeline
llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/FunctionAttrs.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
55 | Why don't we want to check this in the callers of computeFunctionBodyMemoryAccess? Isn't it a strong guarantee? |
llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/FunctionAttrs.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
55 | Yes, we could (and that would let us simplify the caller in D29803 a little). I've uploaded a new patch that does that, and also simplifies the signature of computeFunctionBodyMemoryAccess a little by removing the SCCNodeSet, as we currently have no plans to call that function from an SCC pass. |
llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/FunctionAttrs.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
52 | Document options (specifically the new ThisBody needs some comment). |
Document options (specifically the new ThisBody needs some comment).