[libcxx] [test] Fix non-Standard assumptions when testing sample().
sample() isn't specified with a reproducible algorithm, so expecting
exact output is non-Standard. Mark those tests with LIBCPP_ASSERT.
In test_small_population(), we're guaranteed to get all of the elements,
but not necessarily in their original order. When PopulationCategory is
forward, we're guaranteed stability (and can therefore test equal()).
Otherwise, we can only test is_permutation(). (As it happens, both libcxx
and MSVC's STL provide stability in this scenario for input-only iterators.)
Please add a comment here explaining that the algorithm is non-reproducable.