It does not play well with directories (end up with a bunch of hidden
files).
Also, do not strip the 0 suffix for the first task, especially since
0 can be used by ThinLTO as well now.
Details
Diff Detail
Event Timeline
lib/LTO/LTOBackend.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
64 | With this change we won't get the "." between the module ID and the suffix in the case when we have set UseInputModulePath to true. I suspect that will cause gold tests to fail (and is less pretty overall). Instead, can the new addition of "." after the Task Id on line 61 be removed? |
lib/LTO/LTOBackend.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
64 | Done! |
LGTM with two fixes. One compile failure in gold-plugin.cc noted below, and one test needs the following fix:
diff --git a/test/tools/gold/X86/opt-level.ll b/test/tools/gold/X86/opt-level.ll
index a680a16..66935b4 100644
- a/test/tools/gold/X86/opt-level.ll
+++ b/test/tools/gold/X86/opt-level.ll
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
; RUN: llvm-as -o %t.bc %s
; RUN: %gold -plugin %llvmshlibdir/LLVMgold.so -plugin-opt=save-temps \
; RUN: -plugin-opt=O0 -r -o %t.o %t.bc
-; RUN: llvm-dis < %t.o.4.opt.bc -o - | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-O0 %s
+; RUN: llvm-dis < %t.o.0.4.opt.bc -o - | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-O0 %s
; RUN: %gold -plugin %llvmshlibdir/LLVMgold.so -plugin-opt=save-temps \
; RUN: -plugin-opt=O1 -r -o %t.o %t.bc
-; RUN: llvm-dis < %t.o.4.opt.bc -o - | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-O1 %s
+; RUN: llvm-dis < %t.o.0.4.opt.bc -o - | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-O1 %s
; RUN: %gold -plugin %llvmshlibdir/LLVMgold.so -plugin-opt=save-temps \
; RUN: -plugin-opt=O2 -r -o %t.o %t.bc
-; RUN: llvm-dis < %t.o.4.opt.bc -o - | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-O2 %s
+; RUN: llvm-dis < %t.o.0.4.opt.bc -o - | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-O2 %s
; CHECK-O0: define internal void @foo(
; CHECK-O1: define internal void @foo(
tools/gold/gold-plugin.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
799 | Won't build until Twine removed. |
With this change we won't get the "." between the module ID and the suffix in the case when we have set UseInputModulePath to true. I suspect that will cause gold tests to fail (and is less pretty overall).
Instead, can the new addition of "." after the Task Id on line 61 be removed?