However, this has no effect at this time because the instructions affected
are marked 'isCodeGenOnly=1' and have no alternative for the MC layer.
Details
Details
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
LGTM. I was going to ask for few test cases, as you've done with the previous patches. However, I noticed that we don't have mips16 tests for MC.
Comment Actions
That's right (because MIPS16 lacks any IAS support at the moment) but it's not the reason for the lack of tests. These particular instructions are marked isCodeGenOnly so tablegen doesn't generate matching code for the assembly matcher in IAS. As a result, my change has no effect but I want to avoid leaving an unchecked immediate operand for whoever adds MIPS16 support to the MC layer in the future.