When a derived type has a PRIVATE type-bound generic binding for
a defined ASSIGNMENT(=), don't use it in scopes outside of the
module that defines the type. We already get this case right
for other type-bound generics, including defined operators,
and for non-type-bound generic interfaces, but the check was
not applied for this case.
Details
Details
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
Fix bug found during integration testing -- it is the accessibility of the generic that matters, of course, not the specific binding.