This improves the performance of unwinding on DWARF based targets. The
32-bit x86 support for scanning the full eh_frame
(CFI_Parser::findFDE) apparently does not work (at least not on
Linux). Since the eh_frame_hdr code delegates to that, this still
doesn't work for x86 Linux, but it has been tested on x86_64 Linux and
aarch64 Android.
Details
Diff Detail
Event Timeline
This is passing all of the tests for x86_64, but I'm still having some (seemingly unrelated trouble) with x86. On x86, I'm seeing a bogus return address coming from the CFI here: https://github.com/llvm-mirror/libcxxabi/blob/master/src/Unwind/DwarfInstructions.hpp#L187 So far I haven't had any luck in figuring out why.
In theory this should work for aarch64 too, but I haven't had a chance to test that.
The commit message is actually not correct. This should work for the BSDs as well.
src/Unwind/AddressSpace.hpp | ||
---|---|---|
375 | Do byval captures not work here? | |
383 | As an optimization, I think you can bail early here if the targetAddr cannot possibly be in the particular *.so: if (cbdata->targetAddr < pinfo->dlpi_addr) return false; | |
409 | ||
src/Unwind/EHHeaderParser.hpp | ||
112 | The EHABI unwinder uses some library function for doing its binary search for the EHT entry. Maybe that can be re-used here too. | |
src/Unwind/UnwindCursor.hpp | ||
839 | It's interesting that the cache lookup isn't first. I wonder why (not really important for this review). | |
src/Unwind/config.h | ||
86–88 | I think one of @joerg's platforms uses dwarf unwind on arm. I don't remember the name of the guard he created to detect that though. |
src/Unwind/config.h | ||
---|---|---|
86–88 | elsewhere in libcxxabi there are ifdefs for ARM_DWARF_EH |
src/Unwind/EHHeaderParser.hpp | ||
---|---|---|
120 | Isn't this wrong if you hit a case exactly? |
src/Unwind/EHHeaderParser.hpp | ||
---|---|---|
112 | The case you were thinking of is https://github.com/llvm-mirror/libcxxabi/blob/master/src/Unwind/UnwindCursor.hpp#L676 That's a dependency on libc++, and you've been trying to fix the layering issues here. I don't think I'll add to them :) |
src/Unwind/EHHeaderParser.hpp | ||
---|---|---|
112 | yeah, that's it. I forgot it was using something from std::. Agreed, no need to add one more layering problem. |
@danalbert: reminder so you don't forget about this before @compnerd moves the unwdiner.
Just stumbled upon this patch and thought I'd chime in briefly.
I am currently working on a POSIX-like environment that is completely built around the concept of capability-based security which I am planning on releasing under a BSD license 1-2 months from now. I'm leaning on LLVM components quite heavily (LLVM, Clang, libcxx, libcxxabi, compiler-rt).
To get exceptions working in my environment I previously used a small patch to ld's linker script to add symbols where .eh_frame begins/ends and a change for libcxxabi to use those. After discovering this patch I decided to add dl_iterate_phdr() as well and revert my local changes. So far things work great. All libcxx exception related tests pass properly. At least on x86-64.
That said, keep in mind that ElfW() does not exist on FreeBSD. Adding some code like this makes the code build properly.
#ifndef ElfW #define ElfW(type) ElfW2(__INTPTR_WIDTH__, type) #define ElfW2(width, type) ElfW3(width, type) #define ElfW3(width, type) Elf##width##_##type #endif
Thanks!
Fix the base address for the unwind table.
Apparently this hadn't actually been working before. The header search was
failing, and then the seach was falling back to scanning the whole table.
Thanks to Saleem for noticing my mistake.
Unfortunately this means that we can't actually test this code directly. If it
fails to find the entry in the search table, it will still find it by scanning
the whole section. We should probably add some real unit tests to this project
at some point to deal with this.
src/Unwind/config.h | ||
---|---|---|
86–88 | clang-format hates everything about this project. The other defines in the file match this. |
Do byval captures not work here?