After updating the user interface (https://reviews.llvm.org/D96515), make sure the doc reflects the change.
Details
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
Event Timeline
clang/docs/OpenCLSupport.rst | ||
---|---|---|
67 | ||
123 | "are" or "can be"? | |
clang/docs/UsersManual.rst | ||
2942 | ||
2943 | ||
2949 | Maybe include the error output from running this as well, because otherwise a hasty reader might assume this command should work? | |
3019–3020 | I wonder if we need to keep this example? You're not referring to it from the text and it's not demonstrating any special flags anymore. |
Added corrections from Sven.
clang/docs/UsersManual.rst | ||
---|---|---|
3019–3020 | it's still demonstrating the use of default clang driver invocation i.e. there are no flags needed to compile the code that uses BIFs. |
LGTM!
clang/docs/UsersManual.rst | ||
---|---|---|
3019–3020 | Okay, if you want to make that explicit then I would suggest to add a line like: The following example shows how an OpenCL program that calls various standard builtin functions can be compiled without the need for any explicit includes or compiler flags. |
clang/docs/UsersManual.rst | ||
---|---|---|
3019–3020 | Ok, good idea. I will add this in my final commit. |