There is a discussion of git-format-patch in GettingStarted guide, but no mention of it in the Phabricator.html page.
Details
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo
Event Timeline
Thanks for the patch. I didn't know that this information was missing from our docs!
llvm/docs/Phabricator.rst | ||
---|---|---|
65 | I think this needs to be put into its own section because it's not specific to "Requesting a review via the web interface". Formatting is really about preparing for a review rather than requesting it. Perhaps this information belongs in "How to Submit a Patch" section of the contributing guide and then we could reference that section from this document? Thoughts? |
- Move description of clang-format to Contributing.rst and add a link to Phabricator.rst to reference it.
Thanks for the review @delcypher!
I agree it's probably better to move this. I've put it under the "How to Submit a Patch" section in Contributing.rst, and added a link to it in Phabricator.rst as you suggested.
The only thing I'm not sure about is whether to create a new subsection for it, or just leave it as inline text and link to the paragraph directly (which is what I did). The problem I had with a new subsection was getting "out" of the new subsection for the rest of the instructions under "How to Submit a Patch" (hopefully that makes sense).
The only thing I'm not sure about is whether to create a new subsection for it, or just leave it as inline text and link to the paragraph directly (which is what I did).
I think as the patch is now is fine.
The problem I had with a new subsection was getting "out" of the new subsection for the rest of the instructions under "How to Submit a Patch" (hopefully that makes sense).
I'm not sure what you mean here.
The problem I had with a new subsection was getting "out" of the new subsection for the rest of the instructions under "How to Submit a Patch" (hopefully that makes sense).
I'm not sure what you mean here.
I wouldn't worry about it - this is more my random meanderings.... If you're OK with this, I'll commit it as is.
Thanks again for the review!
I think this needs to be put into its own section because it's not specific to "Requesting a review via the web interface". Formatting is really about preparing for a review rather than requesting it.
Perhaps this information belongs in "How to Submit a Patch" section of the contributing guide and then we could reference that section from this document?
Thoughts?