It is a bit nitpicking, but I think the new naming scheme is what the
people would expect. For example, if we have three tasks,
foo0.lto.o foo1.lto.o foo2.lto.o
is more natural than
foo.lto.o foo1.lto.o foo2.lto.o
(But do we need this logic in the first place? I thought that we could
just always append a job number even when there's only one job.)