This patch seems to fix the problem. Please take a look.
Details
Diff Detail
Event Timeline
Both Reid and David suggested I add Richard to look at this interesting piece of code :)
Neither the before code nor the after code looks right...
The outermost lexical level (and possibly others in the future) can have multiple template parameter lists, and you should use getNumTemplateParameterLists/getTemplateParameterList on each level to add all of them (these exist on DeclaratorDecl for FunctionDecls and on TagDecl for the other cases). For instance:
template<typename A> struct S { template<typename B> struct T; }; template<typename A> template<typename B> struct S<A>::T { template<typename C, typename D> struct U; template<typename C> struct U<C, C> { template<typename E> void f() { /* ... */ } }; };
include/clang/Sema/Sema.h | ||
---|---|---|
4887–4889 ↗ | (On Diff #8998) | Can we fold these three functions together, so we can just say 'reenter the scope of this declaration' and enter all its template parameter lists at once? It's a bit strange that 'ActOnReenterDeclaratorTemplateScope' doesn't actually enter the innermost template scope if the declarator is itself declaring a template. |
lib/Parse/ParseTemplate.cpp | ||
1254–1256 | This side also might have surrounding template parameter lists, if a partial specialization is defined out of line: template<typename T> struct S { template<typename U> struct X; template<typename U> struct X<U*>; }; template<typename T> template<typename U> struct S<T>::X<U*> { void f() {} }; | |
1262–1272 | These steps seem backwards: we should reenter the surrounding template scopes for the class template before we reenter the class template itself. | |
1272 | Why 'record' rather than 'class'? We're pretty consistent in using 'ClassTemplate' (even though we use the unfortunate name 'CXXRecordDecl'). | |
lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp | ||
5983–6000 ↗ | (On Diff #8998) | Maybe factor this out into a static helper template rather than essentially duplicating it? |
Thanks for the review! New patch coming up.
include/clang/Sema/Sema.h | ||
---|---|---|
4887–4889 ↗ | (On Diff #8998) | Done. I've folded them into one function. |
lib/Parse/ParseTemplate.cpp | ||
1254–1256 | Thanks! Added this to the battery of tests. | |
1262–1272 | You're right. I've changed the order. | |
1272 | ActOnReenterRecordTemplateScope has gone away now. | |
lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp | ||
5983–6000 ↗ | (On Diff #8998) | Since I baked the three ActOnReenter*TemplateScope together, I think the code became simpler. |
No objection to the current patch other than the dyn_cast<Decl> thing, but some thoughts.
include/clang/Sema/Sema.h | ||
---|---|---|
4887–4888 ↗ | (On Diff #9013) | It's unusual to have an out parameter and a void return type. Have you considered returning the number of template parameter lists that were entered? |
lib/Parse/ParseTemplate.cpp | ||
1232–1233 | (Not really related to your patch, but...) Shouldn't we be resetting TemplateParameterDepth to 0 somewhere in here? If we decide to lazily parse a templated function definition while we're half-way through parsing another template, our depths will get messed up. (IIRC, we've turned off delayed parsing for constexpr functions and functions with deduced return types, perhaps due to this bug...) | |
1273–1274 | No need for the dyn_cast here. Every DeclContext is a Decl. | |
1280–1288 | Could ActOnReenterTemplateScope do this itself? (That is, entering a templated decl could also enter its template, and thus enter all the template parameter lists on the same logical declaration.) |
include/clang/Sema/Sema.h | ||
---|---|---|
4887–4888 ↗ | (On Diff #9013) | Oops, yeah that makes a lot of sense. Done. |
lib/Parse/ParseTemplate.cpp | ||
1232–1233 | I don't have a deep enough understanding of this to answer, but I do know that we don't have any tests that fail if I reset TemplateParameterDepth to 0 at the end of this function.. | |
1273–1274 | Done. I got confused because DeclContext doesn't inherit from Decl, but I guess every subclass of DeclContext does. | |
1280–1288 | I failed some tests when I tried that before, but that seems to have been unrelated because it works now and makes things much nicer. |
Thanks, that looks nicer.
lib/Parse/ParseTemplate.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
1275 | cast, not dyn_cast, please. | |
1287–1289 | Can you push the function template case into ActOnReenterTemplateScope too? | |
lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp | ||
6000 ↗ | (On Diff #9020) | You should handle all TagDecls here, not just CXXRecordDecls. Under the resolution of DR1607, this is valid: template<typename T> struct A { enum class E; }; template<typename T> enum class A<T>::E { n = (true ? 0 : [] { struct Q { Q() { /* delay parsed */ } } q; return 0; }()) }; ... and instantiating A<T>::E will instantiate the default constructor of Q (note, we currently reject this because we went for a more conservative tentative fix for issue 1607). |
lib/Parse/ParseTemplate.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
1275 | Done. | |
1287–1289 | I can make Actions.ActOnReenterTemplateScope(getCurScope(), FunD); be covered by the loop above if I make sure not to call Actions.PushDeclContext() on it. I have no idea why we then do an extra Actions.ActOnReenterTemplateScope(getCurScope(), LPT.D); since that should have the same effect. But if I remove that, we start failing tests, so I guess it needs to be there. | |
lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp | ||
6000 ↗ | (On Diff #9020) | "Done." |
I'm well into nitpicking mode now; please go ahead and commit after this round.
... and then we can talk about function definitions inside lambdas inside variable templates. I'm sure that'll make your day =)
lib/Parse/ParseTemplate.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
1275 | Maybe sink this into its only use. | |
1287–1289 | I meant, can you make ActOnReenterTemplateScope "do the right thing" when given the pattern declaration of a function template? That is, call getDescribedFunctionTemplate on it, and handle the template parameter list from the function template too. (That's why you still need this extra line -- LPT.D here is the template, FunD is the pattern within the template.) | |
lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp | ||
5987 ↗ | (On Diff #9023) | Please add a comment saying that it doesn't matter what order we collect the template parameter lists in, so future readers don't worry that they're in the wrong order like I just did =) |
5989–5990 ↗ | (On Diff #9023) | Maybe just assert in this case? People shouldn't be passing TemplateDecls in here. |
lib/Parse/ParseTemplate.cpp | ||
---|---|---|
1275 | Done. | |
1287–1289 | OK, managed to get this work eventually. | |
lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp | ||
5987 ↗ | (On Diff #9023) | Done. |
5989–5990 ↗ | (On Diff #9023) | They do, but as you pointed out offline, we should probably continue with the templated decl in that case, so doing that now. |
(Not really related to your patch, but...) Shouldn't we be resetting TemplateParameterDepth to 0 somewhere in here? If we decide to lazily parse a templated function definition while we're half-way through parsing another template, our depths will get messed up. (IIRC, we've turned off delayed parsing for constexpr functions and functions with deduced return types, perhaps due to this bug...)