Details
- Reviewers
rnk
Diff Detail
Event Timeline
docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst | ||
---|---|---|
80 | I believe this is true? |
docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst | ||
---|---|---|
80 | You can actually pass -gdwarf to clang-cl to get DWARF. I'm not sure we need to say anything about what happens when you link with DWARF. We mostly want to say that you need to use link.exe to get PDBs today, and that we are working on PDBs in LLD. |
docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst | ||
---|---|---|
80 | Huh, it's not in /? output for some reason. Do you know why? Should we fix this? (I'll remove the reference to DWARF here) |
docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst | ||
---|---|---|
77 | Are these debuggers modern or are they just debuggers provided by Microsoft? It could be interpreted as a knock against gdb. Maybe we should say: "Windows debuggers that use the Microsoft DIA SDK, such as the Visual Studio debugger"? |
docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst | ||
---|---|---|
77 | Dunno, that was already here, I just kept it. Do they all use the DIA SDK? I thought one of them didn't (but I could be making that up) |
Thanks!
docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst | ||
---|---|---|
77 | I thought they did. Anyway, your wording is good. |
Are these debuggers modern or are they just debuggers provided by Microsoft? It could be interpreted as a knock against gdb. Maybe we should say: "Windows debuggers that use the Microsoft DIA SDK, such as the Visual Studio debugger"?