In r231483 you taught ConstantRange::multiply to be clever about signed vs unsigned ranges. For example, an unsigned range could be full-set while the signed range is more specific than that.
In looking at the allocations trace for LTO'ing verify-uselistorder, I see millions of allocations from APInt, many of which come from ConstantRange's.
This change tries to avoid some (3.2 million) allocations by returning the unsigned range if its suitable. The checks here are that it should not be a wrapping range, and should be positive. That should be enough to check for ranges such as [1, 10) which the signed range will be equal to, if we were to calculate it.