[libc++] Use this in lamba capture in <latch>

[diamante0018]

Summary

"&" seemed to be used in a situation where perhaps it's not the best option.
Other libc++ modules make use of [this] when calling functions from the same class.
[this] would be the appropriate lambda capture specifier to use in this situation.

[ldionne]

Ignore the CI failures, those are a CI infra issue.

[diamante0018]

Hello, thanks for accepting. This would be my first contribution. Do I need to do anything else or will the bot merge this automatically. Thanks.

[Mordante]

In D154358#4469375, @diamante0018 wrote:

Hello, thanks for accepting. This would be my first contribution. Do I need to do anything else or will the bot merge this automatically. Thanks.

Can you provide your name and email address, then we will land the patch on your behalf.

[ldionne]

In D154358#4469375, @diamante0018 wrote:

Hello, thanks for accepting. This would be my first contribution. Do I need to do anything else or will the bot merge this automatically. Thanks.

Thanks for your first contribution by the way!

[diamante0018]

In D154358#4471919, @Mordante wrote:

In D154358#4469375, @diamante0018 wrote:

Hello, thanks for accepting. This would be my first contribution. Do I need to do anything else or will the bot merge this automatically. Thanks.

Can you provide your name and email address, then we will land the patch on your behalf.

Edoardo Sanguineti [e-mail]

Thanks

[Mordante]

In D154358#4471965, @diamante0018 wrote:

In D154358#4471919, @Mordante wrote:

In D154358#4469375, @diamante0018 wrote:

Hello, thanks for accepting. This would be my first contribution. Do I need to do anything else or will the bot merge this automatically. Thanks.

Can you provide your name and email address, then we will land the patch on your behalf.

Edoardo Sanguineti [e-mail]

Thanks

I've landed the patch on your behalf. Thanks for your first contribution!

libcxx/include/latch

     inline _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_SYNC _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
     void wait() const
     {
-        __cxx_atomic_wait(&__a_.__a_, [&]() -> bool {
+        __cxx_atomic_wait(&__a_.__a_, [this]() -> bool {
             return try_wait();
         });
     }