While working on D129830: [lld-macho] Support folding of functions with identical LSDAs, I realized that our handling of ICF +
eh_frame combined was untested. Additionally I realized that the comment
explaining why we were safely slicing away the functionAddress reloc
from our compact unwind entries was... insufficient and slightly
misleading. I've tried to clarify it.
Details
Details
- Reviewers
thevinster - Group Reviewers
Restricted Project - Commits
- rGfe47cfb324cb: [lld-macho][nfc] Add more tests + comments around ICF + unwind info interaction
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG LLVM Github Monorepo